From: "Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]>
To: "Alexander Viro" <[email protected]>,
"Jens Axboe" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected],
"Christian Brauner" <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
"Christian Göttsche" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHES v2] xattr stuff and interactions with io_uring
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 14:57:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241103065156.GS1350452@ZenIV>
On Sun, Nov 3, 2024, at 07:51, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 08:43:31AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Tested on arm64, fwiw I get these:
>>
>> <stdin>:1603:2: warning: #warning syscall setxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>> <stdin>:1606:2: warning: #warning syscall getxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>> <stdin>:1609:2: warning: #warning syscall listxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>> <stdin>:1612:2: warning: #warning syscall removexattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>
> arch/arm64/tools/syscall*.tbl bits are missing (as well as
> arch/sparc/kernel/syscall_32.tbl ones, but that's less of an
> issue).
>
> AFAICS, the following should be the right incremental. Objections, anyone?
Looks fine to me.
I have a patch to convert s390 to use the exact same format
as the others, and I should push that patch, but it slightly
conflict with this one.
We can also remove the old include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
that is no longer used.
I was planning to have a patch by now to only need to chance a
single .tbl file for new entries, which is a bit behind some
other work I have planned for these files.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-03 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 1:10 [RFC][PATCHES] xattr stuff and interactions with io_uring Al Viro
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 1/9] xattr: switch to CLASS(fd) Al Viro
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/9] fs: rename struct xattr_ctx to kernel_xattr_ctx Al Viro
2024-10-02 5:56 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 3/9] io_[gs]etxattr_prep(): just use getname() Al Viro
2024-10-02 5:57 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 4/9] new helper: import_xattr_name() Al Viro
2024-10-02 5:57 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 5/9] replace do_setxattr() with saner helpers Al Viro
2024-10-02 1:34 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-02 2:08 ` Al Viro
2024-10-02 18:00 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-02 21:19 ` Al Viro
2024-10-02 22:55 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-06 5:28 ` Al Viro
2024-10-07 18:09 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-07 18:20 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-07 21:20 ` Al Viro
2024-10-07 22:29 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-07 23:58 ` Al Viro
2024-10-08 1:58 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-08 4:08 ` Al Viro
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 6/9] replace do_getxattr() " Al Viro
2024-10-02 5:59 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 7/9] new helpers: file_listxattr(), filename_listxattr() Al Viro
2024-10-02 6:00 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 8/9] new helpers: file_removexattr(), filename_removexattr() Al Viro
2024-10-02 6:01 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] fs/xattr: add *at family syscalls Al Viro
2024-10-02 6:03 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-02 5:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] xattr: switch to CLASS(fd) Christian Brauner
2024-11-02 7:28 ` [RFC][PATCHES v2] xattr stuff and interactions with io_uring Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] teach filename_lookup() to treat NULL filename as "" Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] getname_maybe_null() - the third variant of pathname copy-in Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] io_uring: IORING_OP_F[GS]ETXATTR is fine with REQ_F_FIXED_FILE Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] io_[gs]etxattr_prep(): just use getname() Al Viro
2024-11-02 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] xattr: switch to CLASS(fd) Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] fs: rename struct xattr_ctx to kernel_xattr_ctx Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] new helper: import_xattr_name() Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] replace do_setxattr() with saner helpers Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] replace do_getxattr() " Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] new helpers: file_listxattr(), filename_listxattr() Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] new helpers: file_removexattr(), filename_removexattr() Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] fs/xattr: add *at family syscalls Al Viro
2024-11-02 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] xattr: remove redundant check on variable err Al Viro
2024-11-02 14:43 ` [RFC][PATCHES v2] xattr stuff and interactions with io_uring Jens Axboe
2024-11-03 6:51 ` Al Viro
2024-11-03 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-11-03 18:32 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8081b55-c770-4709-aa9e-f55c85d78cdb@app.fastmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox