From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B693AE552; Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730642259; cv=none; b=VdJYkvOBbX/9HSHYbaKrDjNIUD1WrQnj5iOOjxhi1agc/Bd7WFv0Q1IQRfzgBUtZ4TFFt/o7xXyboDme4wPBAIc+WUOUsEyAHl8Z09AF+uUnpEMeog/VlUfzQqFOryV5PgUNOpCdZ9LkkyltYYGiiGsAlb2LfwVt8O6QWQ2KolE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730642259; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zpyduir8KASLB7Yy6vBo7DqLdhBpiamlPJhbHc7oh0o=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=eGS0tAdTmX1x8PCa8/HWmnGc8tPq6sHqMAdbHrZ3jvFnr9DojZd+2NM0Wmq2413xctbTWoPioDcNnw8Q+LyBayRgtZiv/ERiaUf1AJt3eFlMsKfLcq1/jYwNE5ssh8IPerfq7wMzJ+BH0manMtpRcR2HMMWfS4u4UJDf7IADdPg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=kl++LKv5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Ajs5ogkw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="kl++LKv5"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Ajs5ogkw" Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A10138013E; Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:57:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-imap-11 ([10.202.2.101]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 03 Nov 2024 08:57:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1730642255; x=1730728655; bh=ydQGTnO+D+8IgXolqjrApABtyzUTC1FsDHb85LN5EBs=; b= kl++LKv5ur8JF8VDRjLQVLqY+1hqs6JwpI7YEJzRcnCTO3Z8fnvPYbSJn8zaDFjR TzaKNapPTrgDhUimyG7GK+nt+ohFuSWerG5SRxaIHyqy726ehxCHlH89BoPPjzHc a4ozIgZMJasFMzYLfpIFiQi2qzRnxn/57I5JDSgMpadwakvlkpFrC4HRI2bHRZ+z xAFC8RqaVLXPEYXNEQcKhcUo87JZzaaHrDMXeobir65l8iCxg4EV/zjBX+GBdmQB 8KETsVcbEBtkGTt76ALzsu8nS1cmlG+MbruPuECjIv3SRM+l9NbnkGMWDySlsbFS X8lUkgAkUlt2m1qjKv2xbQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1730642255; x= 1730728655; bh=ydQGTnO+D+8IgXolqjrApABtyzUTC1FsDHb85LN5EBs=; b=A js5ogkwSnRaA8Gn6DwR9Z0i/ZrMmRHFoM7x1cMS+wR0yB4dG5stM8RxKKpQmHhyO vNBIrNvAU9pZ0Qd/fzTO7vt6kkL6n8yPVgWdsA88TEe4q3dFj0DVDsPkMqqnQNhg LjYotuQvCDgB3IMfzj9cOu+5Z58Q2qtfisqJBabQquPVhaRDVklgLVd114yzUl0L rOYdhhq2JTdizKndUohqgGUuRBbM83Y1axbL665AkKO7zkINw2iEfxbDLfI1ulYi UvVG4XRzzo2oi5JRDo8049BRCXSgXs9S0x/Swtp/OAJb1+tOZuzi35jPRWZKlYti 3dJ5LYcUi3Z8lUgaRhLqw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdelgedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepofggfffhvfevkfgjfhfutgfgsehtjeertdertddt necuhfhrohhmpedftehrnhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrd guvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdthfdvtdefhedukeetgefggffhjeeggeetfefg gfevudegudevledvkefhvdeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomheprghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepiedp mhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheptghgiihonhgvshesghhoohhglhgvmh grihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheprgigsghovgeskhgvrhhnvghlrdgukhdprhgtphht thhopegsrhgruhhnvghrsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehiohdquhhrih hnghesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdhfshgu vghvvghlsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepvhhirhhoseiivg hnihhvrdhlihhnuhigrdhorhhgrdhukh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B93332220071; Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:57:34 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 14:57:14 +0100 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Alexander Viro" , "Jens Axboe" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Brauner" , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_G=C3=B6ttsche?= Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20241103065156.GS1350452@ZenIV> References: <20241002011011.GB4017910@ZenIV> <20241102072834.GQ1350452@ZenIV> <2a01f70e-111c-4981-9165-5f5170242a8c@kernel.dk> <20241103065156.GS1350452@ZenIV> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHES v2] xattr stuff and interactions with io_uring Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, Nov 3, 2024, at 07:51, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 08:43:31AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Tested on arm64, fwiw I get these: >> >> :1603:2: warning: #warning syscall setxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] >> :1606:2: warning: #warning syscall getxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] >> :1609:2: warning: #warning syscall listxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] >> :1612:2: warning: #warning syscall removexattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] > > arch/arm64/tools/syscall*.tbl bits are missing (as well as > arch/sparc/kernel/syscall_32.tbl ones, but that's less of an > issue). > > AFAICS, the following should be the right incremental. Objections, anyone? Looks fine to me. I have a patch to convert s390 to use the exact same format as the others, and I should push that patch, but it slightly conflict with this one. We can also remove the old include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h that is no longer used. I was planning to have a patch by now to only need to chance a single .tbl file for new entries, which is a bit behind some other work I have planned for these files. Arnd