From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: support to inject result for NOP
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:19:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/9/24 7:14 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Support to inject result for NOP so that we can inject failure from
> userspace. It is very helpful for covering failure handling code in
> io_uring core change.
>
> With nop flags, it could be possible to add more test feature for NOP in
> future, but the NOP behavior of direct completion has to be kept.
>
> Cleared NOP SQE is required, look both liburing and Rust io-uring crate
> clears SQE, and it shouldn't be one big deal for raw, especially it is
> just NOP.
I think this implementation looks fine, but probably would be best if
you first had a prep patch that adds nop_flags to io_uring_sqe, and
checks it in io_nop_prep() and fails if it's non-zero. Then we can mark
that for stable, rather than need to do the whole thing.
Then patch 2 adds the actual meat of this patch, and now adds the proper
check in io_nop_prep() for whether any unknown flags are set.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index 922f29b07ccc..5db3a209b302 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,10 @@ struct io_uring_sqe {
> __u32 optname;
> };
> };
> - __u32 len; /* buffer size or number of iovecs */
> + union {
> + __u32 len; /* buffer size or number of iovecs */
> + __s32 result; /* for NOP to inject result only */
> + };
> union {
And I'd drop that, just use 'len' throughout.
Rest of the patch looks fine as-is.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-10 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 1:14 [PATCH] io_uring: support to inject result for NOP Ming Lei
2024-05-10 2:19 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-05-10 3:07 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox