From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] io_uring/uring_cmd: avoid double indirect call in task work dispatch
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:42:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPr1i-k0byzYjv8G@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023201830.3109805-4-csander@purestorage.com>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 02:18:30PM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> io_uring task work dispatch makes an indirect call to struct io_kiocb's
> io_task_work.func field to allow running arbitrary task work functions.
> In the uring_cmd case, this calls io_uring_cmd_work(), which immediately
> makes another indirect call to struct io_uring_cmd's task_work_cb field.
> Define the uring_cmd task work callbacks as functions whose signatures
> match io_req_tw_func_t. Define a IO_URING_CMD_TASK_WORK_ISSUE_FLAGS
> constant in io_uring/cmd.h to avoid manufacturing issue_flags in the
> uring_cmd task work callbacks. Now uring_cmd task work dispatch makes a
> single indirect call to the uring_cmd implementation's callback. This
> also allows removing the task_work_cb field from struct io_uring_cmd,
> freeing up some additional storage space.
The idea looks good.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
> ---
> block/ioctl.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 15 +++++++++------
> drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 5 +++--
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 +++-
> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 5 +++--
> include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h | 16 +++++++---------
> io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 13 ++-----------
> 7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index d7489a56b33c..5c10d48fab27 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -767,13 +767,15 @@ long compat_blkdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
> struct blk_iou_cmd {
> int res;
> bool nowait;
> };
>
> -static void blk_cmd_complete(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
> +static void blk_cmd_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, io_tw_token_t tw)
> {
> + struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_uring_cmd);
> struct blk_iou_cmd *bic = io_uring_cmd_to_pdu(cmd, struct blk_iou_cmd);
> + unsigned int issue_flags = IO_URING_CMD_TASK_WORK_ISSUE_FLAGS;
Now `io_kiocb` is exposed to driver, it could be perfect if 'io_uring_cmd'
is kept in kernel API interface, IMO.
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h b/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h
> index b84b97c21b43..3efad93404f9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h
> @@ -9,18 +9,13 @@
> /* only top 8 bits of sqe->uring_cmd_flags for kernel internal use */
> #define IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE (1U << 30)
> /* io_uring_cmd is being issued again */
> #define IORING_URING_CMD_REISSUE (1U << 31)
>
> -typedef void (*io_uring_cmd_tw_t)(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> - unsigned issue_flags);
> -
> struct io_uring_cmd {
> struct file *file;
> const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
> - /* callback to defer completions to task context */
> - io_uring_cmd_tw_t task_work_cb;
> u32 cmd_op;
> u32 flags;
> u8 pdu[32]; /* available inline for free use */
pdu[40]
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 20:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] io_uring/uring_cmd: avoid double indirect call in task work dispatch Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-10-23 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] io_uring: expose io_should_terminate_tw() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-10-24 3:26 ` Ming Lei
2025-10-23 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] io_uring/uring_cmd: call io_should_terminate_tw() when needed Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-10-24 3:27 ` Ming Lei
2025-10-23 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] io_uring/uring_cmd: avoid double indirect call in task work dispatch Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-10-24 3:42 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-10-24 3:49 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-10-24 4:21 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPr1i-k0byzYjv8G@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox