public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/rsrc: don't use blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() as number of bvecs
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:01:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRPcdmpZoet2fwbu@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251111191530.1268875-1-csander@purestorage.com>

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 12:15:29PM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> io_buffer_register_bvec() currently uses blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() as
> the number of bvecs in the request. However, bvecs may be split into
> multiple segments depending on the queue limits. Thus, the number of
> segments may overestimate the number of bvecs. For ublk devices, the
> only current users of io_buffer_register_bvec(), virt_boundary_mask,
> seg_boundary_mask, max_segments, and max_segment_size can all be set
> arbitrarily by the ublk server process.
> Set imu->nr_bvecs based on the number of bvecs the rq_for_each_bvec()
> loop actually yields. However, continue using blk_rq_nr_phys_segments()
> as an upper bound on the number of bvecs when allocating imu to avoid
> needing to iterate the bvecs a second time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
> Fixes: 27cb27b6d5ea ("io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs")

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

BTW, this issue may not be a problem because ->nr_bvecs is only used in
iov_iter_bvec(), in which 'offset' and 'len' can control how far the
iterator can reach, so the uninitialized bvecs won't be touched basically.

Otherwise, the issue should have been triggered somewhere.

Also the bvec allocation may be avoided in case of single-bio request,
which can be one future optimization.


Thanks,
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-11 19:15 [PATCH] io_uring/rsrc: don't use blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() as number of bvecs Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-11 19:19 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-12  1:01 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-11-12  1:44   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-12  1:59     ` Ming Lei
2025-11-12 15:26 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRPcdmpZoet2fwbu@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox