From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Hao Xu <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] io_uring: use slist for completion batching
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:32:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 9/28/21 3:41 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 9/26/21 7:57 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> 在 2021/9/25 上午4:59, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
>>> Currently we collect requests for completion batching in an array.
>>> Replace them with a singly linked list. It's as fast as arrays but
>>> doesn't take some much space in ctx, and will be used in future patches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/io_uring.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> index 9c14e9e722ba..9a76c4f84311 100644
>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> @@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ struct io_submit_state {
>>> /*
>>> * Batch completion logic
>>> */
>>> - struct io_kiocb *compl_reqs[IO_COMPL_BATCH];
>>> - unsigned int compl_nr;
>>> + struct io_wq_work_list compl_reqs;
>> Will it be better to rename struct io_wq_work_list to something more
>> generic, io_wq_work_list is a bit confused, we are now using this
>> type of linked list (stack as well) for various aim, not just to link
>> iowq works.
>
> Was thinking about it, e.g. io_slist, but had been already late --
> lots of conflicts and a good chance to add a couple of extra bugs
> on rebase. I think we can do it afterward (if ever considering
> it troubles backporting)
Agree with both of you - it should be renamed, but at the same time it's
also really annoying with trivial conflicts for eg stable patches due to
random renaming. I was bit by this again just recently, function rename
in that case.
So let's keep the name for now, and once we have some quiet time, we
can get that done.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-28 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-24 20:59 [PATCH v2 00/24] rework and optimise submission+completion paths Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] io_uring: mark having different creds unlikely Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] io_uring: force_nonspin Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] io_uring: make io_do_iopoll return number of reqs Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] io_uring: use slist for completion batching Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-26 6:57 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-28 9:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-28 15:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] io_uring: remove allocation cache array Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] io-wq: add io_wq_work_node based stack Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] io_uring: replace list with stack for req caches Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] io_uring: split iopoll loop Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] io_uring: use single linked list for iopoll Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] io_uring: add a helper for batch free Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-26 3:36 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-28 9:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] io_uring: convert iopoll_completed to store_release Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] io_uring: optimise batch completion Pavel Begunkov
[not found] ` <CAFUsyfLSXMvd_MBAp83qriW7LD=bg2=25TC4e_X4oMO1atoPYg@mail.gmail.com>
2021-09-28 9:35 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] io_uring: inline completion batching helpers Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] io_uring: don't pass tail into io_free_batch_list Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] io_uring: don't pass state to io_submit_state_end Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] io_uring: deduplicate io_queue_sqe() call sites Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] io_uring: remove drain_active check from hot path Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] io_uring: split slow path from io_queue_sqe Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] io_uring: inline hot path of __io_queue_sqe() Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] io_uring: reshuffle queue_sqe completion handling Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] io_uring: restructure submit sqes to_submit checks Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] io_uring: kill off ->inflight_entry field Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] io_uring: comment why inline complete calls io_clean_op() Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] io_uring: disable draining earlier Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-30 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] rework and optimise submission+completion paths Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox