From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FEDC433E0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FEC2251D for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728827AbhAYRFB (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:05:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728589AbhAYRE4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:04:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF92C06174A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:04:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id q2so5257315plk.4 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:04:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mPdMkRBLb/5dfEsFw461WVjsm7UMMnTc9u26CZ29Kjk=; b=zatq4+uhFxhCg6jPKZ1FSpjrvv715beXtpmcSLom3j1szec3bFk8g2j4P1sWe8uw1e mVljjUnloBgwo8rUgANXSy9MR/PUiZenoggEL3ScVKakNug0raRTJKgUHGiLn782EHkZ ZEuMwQFcWEbJuDsf8PAQvtNfaF6PjJf9hE5sq5NBrPdZuGjItWHXH5wu9eYsVKGGkJ0O VwFXHZkX7q/zh+F77aGAQ9x5CB2SXrhbjd/yRHEM3q74KqMKL7blsw6tDts/0Pgx8fda tJ9OKpq1DzXScMu85iqG4khuj0ehgDllXj2w7w9bJ0aJkfJCWXR6bV6Jr+lexw2aGFEj z1Hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mPdMkRBLb/5dfEsFw461WVjsm7UMMnTc9u26CZ29Kjk=; b=ZH493M5f7O22Sd2YpoIEKIpBSVaI9VGPgfVl4QrucHhedAhSfmX20bDXCTP2Qayb/Q /t9icRg1Wz/cnpvNlGM2H2Gp7HazWT2dUzKXX6vvcdfk6E4enDNJ5riw0QwKOEdi7LPe uZofb7k79D5a4etsgkaaTbVSgWi5ZVWpmHh35BkeultUl3Ma0Hl7rd2SG/Kvh+KbBhhn AjKGl7UinvDDMjGbGuutOzp+m6759LPBlfeytuIOZjBD8cpejzSpJh56cSfOiNXcmmND wWMctTxD2Sr7NRZ9bsMBCtn1hDfwv9lQ9oFM06miUjZO3ZKJvHoGQlfQQjy7KMgNeKlT QJsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vF4RtoZ9AyqbKeRxzQsizjaNjjGYW4ZlTTeNWP3ZcKAfHyLrH xdoNRP78SvnHrXva7aSgH24vMEY+fQPiWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6i1m7nMpgtCXpzgoWXOlQaER1bh0HQty5EUwj5tqRrfuf1MgR0SHXqEyl9k5DUuFRHgY/EA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ae12:: with SMTP id t18mr1225396pjq.92.1611594252707; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.4.41] (cpe-72-132-29-68.dc.res.rr.com. [72.132.29.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gl6sm19386787pjb.3.2021.01.25.09.04.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:04:11 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] second part of 5.12 patches To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: <5b3cfdda-b16c-5dca-da9a-1c034571f91f@gmail.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:04:10 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5b3cfdda-b16c-5dca-da9a-1c034571f91f@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 1/25/21 9:56 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 25/01/2021 16:08, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 1/25/21 4:42 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >> >> Applied 1-2 for now. Maybe the context state is workable for the >> state, if the numbers are looking this good. I'll try and run >> it here too and see what I find. > > I believe I've seen it jumping from ~9.5M to 14M with turbo boost > and not so strict environment, but this claim is not very reliable. Would be nice to see some numbers using eg a network echo bench, or storage that actually does IO. Even null_blk is better than just a nop benchmark, even if that one is nice to use as well. But better as a complement than the main thing. -- Jens Axboe