public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 liburing] Test consistent file position updates
@ 2022-02-22 10:57 Dylan Yudaken
  2022-02-23 23:44 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Yudaken @ 2022-02-22 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: kernel-team, Dylan Yudaken

read(2)/write(2) and friends support sequential reads without giving an
explicit offset. The result of these should leave the file with an
incremented offset.

Add tests for both read and write to check that io_uring behaves
consistently in these scenarios. Expect that if you queue many
reads/writes, and set the IOSQE_IO_LINK flag, that they will behave
similarly to calling read(2)/write(2) in sequence.

Set IOSQE_ASYNC as well in a set of tests. This exacerbates the problem by
forcing work to happen in different threads to submission.

Also add tests for not setting IOSQE_IO_LINK, but allow the file offset to
progress past the end of the file.

Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
---

v2:
 - fixed a bug in how cqe ordering was processed
 - enforce sequential reads for !IOSQE_IO_LINK

v3:
 - lots of style cleanups
 - do not output on success

test/Makefile |   1 +
 test/fpos.c   | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 257 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/fpos.c

diff --git a/test/Makefile b/test/Makefile
index 1e318f7..f421f53 100644
--- a/test/Makefile
+++ b/test/Makefile
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ test_srcs := \
 	file-update.c \
 	file-verify.c \
 	fixed-link.c \
+	fpos.c \
 	fsync.c \
 	hardlink.c \
 	io-cancel.c \
diff --git a/test/fpos.c b/test/fpos.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..40df613
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/fpos.c
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
+/*
+ * Description: test io_uring fpos handling
+ *
+ */
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <assert.h>
+
+#include "helpers.h"
+#include "liburing.h"
+
+#define FILE_SIZE 5000
+#define QUEUE_SIZE 2048
+
+static void create_file(const char *file, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t ret;
+	char *buf;
+	size_t idx;
+	int fd;
+
+	buf = t_malloc(size);
+	for (idx = 0; idx < size; ++idx) {
+		/* write 0 or 1 */
+		buf[idx] = (unsigned char)(idx & 0x01);
+	}
+
+	fd = open(file, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0644);
+	assert(fd >= 0);
+
+	ret = write(fd, buf, size);
+	fsync(fd);
+	close(fd);
+	free(buf);
+	assert(ret == size);
+}
+
+static int test_read(struct io_uring *ring, bool async, bool link,
+		     int blocksize)
+{
+	int ret, fd, i;
+	bool done = false;
+	struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
+	struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
+	loff_t current, expected = 0;
+	int count_ok;
+	int count_0 = 0, count_1 = 0;
+	unsigned char buff[QUEUE_SIZE * blocksize];
+	unsigned char reordered[QUEUE_SIZE * blocksize];
+
+	create_file(".test_fpos_read", FILE_SIZE);
+	fd = open(".test_fpos_read", O_RDONLY);
+	unlink(".test_fpos_read");
+	assert(fd >= 0);
+
+	while (!done) {
+		for (i = 0; i < QUEUE_SIZE; ++i) {
+			sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
+			if (!sqe) {
+				fprintf(stderr, "no sqe\n");
+				return -1;
+			}
+			io_uring_prep_read(sqe, fd,
+					buff + i * blocksize,
+					blocksize, -1);
+			sqe->user_data = i;
+			if (async)
+				sqe->flags |= IOSQE_ASYNC;
+			if (link && i != QUEUE_SIZE - 1)
+				sqe->flags |= IOSQE_IO_LINK;
+		}
+		ret = io_uring_submit_and_wait(ring, QUEUE_SIZE);
+		if (ret != QUEUE_SIZE) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "submit failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return 1;
+		}
+		count_ok  = 0;
+		for (i = 0; i < QUEUE_SIZE; ++i) {
+			int res;
+
+			ret = io_uring_peek_cqe(ring, &cqe);
+			if (ret) {
+				fprintf(stderr, "peek failed: %d\n", ret);
+				return ret;
+			}
+			assert(cqe->user_data < QUEUE_SIZE);
+			memcpy(reordered + count_ok,
+				buff + cqe->user_data * blocksize, blocksize);
+			res = cqe->res;
+			io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe);
+			if (res == 0) {
+				done = true;
+			} else if (res == -ECANCELED) {
+				/* cancelled, probably ok */
+			} else if (res < 0 || res > blocksize) {
+				fprintf(stderr, "bad read: %d\n", res);
+				return -1;
+			} else {
+				expected += res;
+				count_ok += res;
+			}
+		}
+		ret = 0;
+		for (i = 0; i < count_ok; i++) {
+			if (reordered[i] == 1) {
+				count_1++;
+			} else if (reordered[i] == 0) {
+				count_0++;
+			} else {
+				fprintf(stderr, "odd read %d\n",
+						(int)reordered[i]);
+				ret = -1;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		if (labs(count_1 - count_0) > 1) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "inconsistent reads, got 0s:%d 1s:%d\n",
+					count_0, count_1);
+			ret = -1;
+		}
+		current = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
+		if (current < expected || (current != expected && link)) {
+			/* accept that with !link current may be > expected */
+			fprintf(stderr, "f_pos incorrect, expected %ld have %ld\n",
+					expected, current);
+			ret = -1;
+		}
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+
+static int test_write(struct io_uring *ring, bool async,
+		      bool link, int blocksize)
+{
+	int ret, fd, i;
+	struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
+	struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
+	bool fail = false;
+	loff_t current;
+	char data[blocksize+1];
+	char readbuff[QUEUE_SIZE*blocksize+1];
+
+	fd = open(".test_fpos_write", O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0644);
+	unlink(".test_fpos_write");
+	assert(fd >= 0);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < blocksize; i++)
+		data[i] = 'A' + i;
+
+	data[blocksize] = '\0';
+
+	for (i = 0; i < QUEUE_SIZE; ++i) {
+		sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
+		if (!sqe) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "no sqe\n");
+			return -1;
+		}
+		io_uring_prep_write(sqe, fd, data + (i % blocksize), 1, -1);
+		sqe->user_data = 1;
+		if (async)
+			sqe->flags |= IOSQE_ASYNC;
+		if (link && i != QUEUE_SIZE - 1)
+			sqe->flags |= IOSQE_IO_LINK;
+	}
+	ret = io_uring_submit_and_wait(ring, QUEUE_SIZE);
+	if (ret != QUEUE_SIZE) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "submit failed: %d\n", ret);
+		return 1;
+	}
+	for (i = 0; i < QUEUE_SIZE; ++i) {
+		int res;
+
+		ret = io_uring_peek_cqe(ring, &cqe);
+		res = cqe->res;
+		if (ret) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "peek failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+		io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe);
+		if (!fail && res != 1) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "bad result %d\n", res);
+			fail = true;
+		}
+	}
+	current = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
+	if (current != QUEUE_SIZE) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "f_pos incorrect, expected %ld have %d\n",
+				current, QUEUE_SIZE);
+		fail = true;
+	}
+	current = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
+	if (current != 0) {
+		perror("seek to start");
+		return -1;
+	}
+	ret = read(fd, readbuff, QUEUE_SIZE);
+	if (ret != QUEUE_SIZE) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "did not write enough: %d\n", ret);
+		return -1;
+	}
+	i = 0;
+	while (i < QUEUE_SIZE - blocksize) {
+		if (strncmp(readbuff + i, data, blocksize)) {
+			char bad[QUEUE_SIZE+1];
+
+			memcpy(bad, readbuff + i, blocksize);
+			bad[blocksize] = '\0';
+			fprintf(stderr, "unexpected data %s\n", bad);
+			fail = true;
+		}
+		i += blocksize;
+	}
+
+	return fail ? -1 : 0;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	struct io_uring ring;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (argc > 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = io_uring_queue_init(QUEUE_SIZE, &ring, 0);
+	if (ret) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "ring setup failed\n");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	for (int test = 0; test < 16; test++) {
+		int async = test & 0x01;
+		int link = test & 0x02;
+		int write = test & 0x04;
+		int blocksize = test & 0x08 ? 1 : 7;
+
+		ret = write
+			? test_write(&ring, !!async, !!link, blocksize)
+			: test_read(&ring, !!async, !!link, blocksize);
+		if (ret) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "failed %s async=%d link=%d blocksize=%d\n",
+					write ? "write" : "read",
+					async, link, blocksize);
+			return -1;
+		}
+	}
+	return 0;
+}

base-commit: 20bb37e0f828909742f845b8113b2bb7e1065cd1
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 liburing] Test consistent file position updates
  2022-02-22 10:57 [PATCH v3 liburing] Test consistent file position updates Dylan Yudaken
@ 2022-02-23 23:44 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-02-23 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dylan Yudaken, Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: kernel-team

On 2/22/22 3:57 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> read(2)/write(2) and friends support sequential reads without giving an
> explicit offset. The result of these should leave the file with an
> incremented offset.
> 
> Add tests for both read and write to check that io_uring behaves
> consistently in these scenarios. Expect that if you queue many
> reads/writes, and set the IOSQE_IO_LINK flag, that they will behave
> similarly to calling read(2)/write(2) in sequence.
> 
> Set IOSQE_ASYNC as well in a set of tests. This exacerbates the problem by
> forcing work to happen in different threads to submission.
> 
> Also add tests for not setting IOSQE_IO_LINK, but allow the file offset to
> progress past the end of the file.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-23 23:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-22 10:57 [PATCH v3 liburing] Test consistent file position updates Dylan Yudaken
2022-02-23 23:44 ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox