From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: switch struct io_ring_ctx internal bitfields to flags
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 08:46:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af3311c8-21b0-4641-bce3-d9bc2e2367c5@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sea1wzmr.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>
On 3/14/26 9:16 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
>
>> Bitfields cannot be set and checked atomically, and this makes it more
>> clear that these are indeed in shared storage and must be checked and
>> set in a sane fashion. This is in preparation for annotating a few of
>> the known racy, but harmless, flags checking.
>>
>> No intended functional changes in this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>> ---
>> include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 32 +++++++------
>> io_uring/eventfd.c | 4 +-
>> io_uring/io_uring.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> io_uring/io_uring.h | 9 ++--
>> io_uring/msg_ring.c | 2 +-
>> io_uring/register.c | 8 ++--
>> io_uring/rsrc.c | 8 ++--
>> io_uring/tctx.c | 2 +-
>> io_uring/timeout.c | 4 +-
>> io_uring/tw.c | 2 +-
>> 10 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
>> index dd1420bfcb73..b84576374c7b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
>> @@ -268,24 +268,28 @@ struct io_alloc_cache {
>> unsigned int init_clear;
>> };
>>
>> +enum {
>> + IO_RING_F_DRAIN_NEXT = BIT(0),
>> + IO_RING_F_OP_RESTRICTED = BIT(1),
>> + IO_RING_F_REG_RESTRICTED = BIT(2),
>> + IO_RING_F_OFF_TIMEOUT_USED = BIT(3),
>> + IO_RING_F_DRAIN_ACTIVE = BIT(4),
>> + IO_RING_F_HAS_EVFD = BIT(5),
>> + /* all CQEs should be posted only by the submitter task */
>> + IO_RING_F_TASK_COMPLETE = BIT(6),
>> + IO_RING_F_LOCKLESS_CQ = BIT(7),
>> + IO_RING_F_SYSCALL_IOPOLL = BIT(8),
>> + IO_RING_F_POLL_ACTIVATED = BIT(9),
>> + IO_RING_F_DRAIN_DISABLED = BIT(10),
>> + IO_RING_F_COMPAT = BIT(11),
>> + IO_RING_F_IOWQ_LIMITS_SET = BIT(12),
>> +};
>> +
>> struct io_ring_ctx {
>> /* const or read-mostly hot data */
>> struct {
>> unsigned int flags;
>> - unsigned int drain_next: 1;
>> - unsigned int op_restricted: 1;
>> - unsigned int reg_restricted: 1;
>> - unsigned int off_timeout_used: 1;
>> - unsigned int drain_active: 1;
>> - unsigned int has_evfd: 1;
>> - /* all CQEs should be posted only by the submitter task */
>> - unsigned int task_complete: 1;
>> - unsigned int lockless_cq: 1;
>> - unsigned int syscall_iopoll: 1;
>> - unsigned int poll_activated: 1;
>> - unsigned int drain_disabled: 1;
>> - unsigned int compat: 1;
>> - unsigned int iowq_limits_set : 1;
>> + unsigned int int_flags;
>
> Jens,
>
> What does the int prefix means in this context?
It's just short for 'internal'.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-15 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-14 14:58 [PATCHSET for-next 0/2] Replace io_ring_ctx bitfields with flags Jens Axboe
2026-03-14 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: switch struct io_ring_ctx internal bitfields to flags Jens Axboe
2026-03-15 3:16 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-03-15 14:46 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-03-16 20:34 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-03-16 21:33 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-14 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: mark known and harmless racy ctx->int_flags uses Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af3311c8-21b0-4641-bce3-d9bc2e2367c5@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krisman@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox