public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JeffleXu <[email protected]>
To: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/7] block: add iopoll method for non-mq device
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:24:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>



On 1/8/21 5:47 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23 2020 at  6:26am -0500,
> Jeffle Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> ->poll_fn is introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
>> callback to struct request_queue") for supporting non-mq queues such as
>> nvme multipath, but removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block: remove
>> ->poll_fn").
>>
>> To add support of IO polling for non-mq device, this method need to be
>> back. Since commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to
>> struct block_device_operations") has moved all callbacks into struct
>> block_device_operations in gendisk, we also add the new method named
>> ->iopoll in block_device_operations.
> 
> Please update patch subject and header to:
> 
> block: add iopoll method to support bio-based IO polling
> 
> ->poll_fn was introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
> callback to struct request_queue") to support bio-based queues such as
> nvme multipath, but was later removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block:
> remove ->poll_fn").
> 
> Given commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to struct
> block_device_operations") restore the possibility of bio-based IO
> polling support by adding an ->iopoll method to gendisk->fops.
> Elevate bulk of blk_mq_poll() implementation to blk_poll() and reduce
> blk_mq_poll() to blk-mq specific code that is called from blk_poll().
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-core.c       | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  block/blk-mq.c         | 70 +++++--------------------------------
>>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 ++
>>  include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
>>  4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 96e5fcd7f071..2f5c51ce32e3 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -1131,6 +1131,85 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio);
>>  
>> +static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
>> +{
>> +	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>> +
>> +	/* TODO: bio-based device doesn't support hybrid poll. */
>> +	if (!queue_is_mq(q))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
>> +	if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	hctx->poll_considered++;
>> +	return false;
>> +}
> 
> I don't see where you ever backfill bio-based hybrid support (in
> the following patches in this series, so it is lingering TODO).

Yes the hybrid polling is not implemented and thus bypassed for
bio-based device currently.

> 
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
>> + * @q:  the queue
>> + * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time
>> + * @spin: whether to spin for completions
>> + *
>> + * Description:
>> + *    Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of
>> + *    completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will continue
>> + *    looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is
>> + *    otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule).
>> + */
>> +int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>> +{
>> +	long state;
>> +
>> +	if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
>> +	    !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (current->plug)
>> +		blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
>> +	 * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
>> +	 * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
>> +	 * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
>> +	 * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
>> +	 * we also should not sleep.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (spin && blk_poll_hybrid(q, cookie))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	state = current->state;
>> +	do {
>> +		int ret;
>> +		struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q);
>> +
>> +		if (disk->fops->iopoll)
>> +			ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
>> +		else
>> +			ret = blk_mq_poll(q, cookie);

The original code is indeed buggy. For bio-based device, ->iopoll() may
not be implemented while QUEUE_FLAG_POLL flag is still set, in which
case blk_mq_poll() will be called for this bio-based device.

> 
> Really don't like that blk-mq is needlessly getting gendisk and checking
> disk->fops->iopoll.
> 
> This is just to give an idea, whitespace damaged due to coding in mail
> client, but why not remove above blk_poll_hybrid() and do:
> 
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = NULL;
> struct gendisk *disk = NULL;
> ...
> 
> if (queue_is_mq(q)) {
> 	/*
> 	 * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
> 	 * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
> 	 * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
> 	 * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
> 	 * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
> 	 * we also should not sleep.
> 	 */
> 	hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
> 	if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
> 		return 1;
> 	hctx->poll_considered++;   
> } else {
> 	disk = queue_to_disk(q);
> }
> 
> do {
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	if (hctx)
> 	        ret = blk_mq_poll(q, hctx, cookie);
> 	else if (disk->fops->iopoll)
> 		ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
> 		

Regards.


>> +		if (ret > 0) {
>> +			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
>> +			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> +
>> +		if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
>> +			return 1;
>> +		if (ret < 0 || !spin)
>> +			break;
>> +		cpu_relax();
>> +	} while (!need_resched());
>> +
>> +	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_poll);
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * blk_cloned_rq_check_limits - Helper function to check a cloned request
>>   *                              for the new queue limits
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index b09ce00cc6af..85258958e9f1 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -3818,8 +3818,8 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(struct request_queue *q,
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>> -			       struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
>> +bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>> +			struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
>>  {
>>  	struct request *rq;
>>  
>> @@ -3843,72 +3843,20 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>>  	return blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(q, rq);
>>  }
>>  
>> -/**
>> - * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
>> - * @q:  the queue
>> - * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time
>> - * @spin: whether to spin for completions
>> - *
>> - * Description:
>> - *    Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of
>> - *    completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will continue
>> - *    looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is
>> - *    otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule).
>> - */
>> -int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>> +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
>>  {
>> +	int ret;
>>  	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>> -	long state;
>> -
>> -	if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
>> -	    !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
>> -		return 0;
>> -
>> -	if (current->plug)
>> -		blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
>>  
>>  	hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
> 
> 
> Given my suggested code changes above, pass hctx in to blk_mq_poll() to
> avoid redundant code to access it in q->queue_hw_ctx[], so:
> 
> int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q,
>     		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
> 

Regards.

>> -	/*
>> -	 * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
>> -	 * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
>> -	 * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
>> -	 * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
>> -	 * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
>> -	 * we also should not sleep.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
>> -		return 1;
>> -
>> -	hctx->poll_considered++;
>> +	hctx->poll_invoked++;
>> +	ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
>> +	if (ret > 0)
>> +		hctx->poll_success++;
>>  
>> -	state = current->state;
>> -	do {
>> -		int ret;
>> -
>> -		hctx->poll_invoked++;
>> -
>> -		ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
>> -		if (ret > 0) {
>> -			hctx->poll_success++;
>> -			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> -			return ret;
>> -		}
>> -
>> -		if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
>> -			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> -
>> -		if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
>> -			return 1;
>> -		if (ret < 0 || !spin)
>> -			break;
>> -		cpu_relax();
>> -	} while (!need_resched());
>> -
>> -	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return ret;
>>  }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_poll);
>>  
>>  unsigned int blk_mq_rq_cpu(struct request *rq)
>>  {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>> index 47b021952ac7..032e08ecd42e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>> @@ -607,6 +607,9 @@ static inline void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
>>  }
>>  
>>  blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio);
>> +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie);
>> +bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>> +		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie);
>>  void blk_mq_hctx_set_fq_lock_class(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>  		struct lock_class_key *key);
>>  
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> index 2303d06a5a82..e8965879eb90 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> @@ -1845,6 +1845,7 @@ static inline void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q) { }
>>  
>>  struct block_device_operations {
>>  	blk_qc_t (*submit_bio) (struct bio *bio);
>> +	int (*iopoll)(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie);
>>  	int (*open) (struct block_device *, fmode_t);
>>  	void (*release) (struct gendisk *, fmode_t);
>>  	int (*rw_page)(struct block_device *, sector_t, struct page *, unsigned int);
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0
>>
>> --
>> dm-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Jeffle

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-08  3:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23 11:26 [PATCH RFC 0/7] dm: add support of iopoll Jeffle Xu
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] block: move definition of blk_qc_t to types.h Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 19:04   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] block: add helper function fetching gendisk from queue Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 20:31   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] block: add iopoll method for non-mq device Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 21:47   ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-08  3:24     ` JeffleXu [this message]
2021-01-08 17:33       ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-11  7:50         ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] block: define blk_qc_t as uintptr_t Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 21:52   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] dm: always return BLK_QC_T_NONE for bio-based device Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 21:54   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] block: track cookies of split bios " Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 22:18   ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-08  3:08     ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-08 17:26       ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-12  5:46         ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-12 16:13           ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-14  9:16             ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-14 14:30               ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-12  7:11         ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] dm: add support for IO polling Jeffle Xu
2021-01-08  3:12   ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-07  1:14 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/7] dm: add support of iopoll JeffleXu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b081f3bd-fc6f-f7c1-80eb-c8380fc8e8b9@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox