From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:36:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b11b0ab3920e4da79ce54e565cfb2b7f4ebbc0d3.1609789890.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
IOPOLL skips completion locking but keeps it under uring_lock, thus
io_cqring_overflow_flush() and so io_cqring_events() need additional
locking with uring_lock in some cases for IOPOLL.
Remove __io_cqring_overflow_flush() from io_cqring_events(), introduce a
wrapper around flush doing needed synchronisation and call it by hand.
Cc: [email protected] # 5.5+
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 5be33fd8b6bc..445035b24a50 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1713,9 +1713,9 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
}
/* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
-static bool io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
- struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct files_struct *files)
+static bool __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
+ struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct files_struct *files)
{
struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings;
struct io_kiocb *req, *tmp;
@@ -1768,6 +1768,20 @@ static bool io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
return all_flushed;
}
+static void io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
+ struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct files_struct *files)
+{
+ if (test_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow)) {
+ /* iopoll syncs against uring_lock, not completion_lock */
+ if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ __io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, force, tsk, files);
+ if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ }
+}
+
static void __io_cqring_fill_event(struct io_kiocb *req, long res, long cflags)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -2314,20 +2328,8 @@ static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
io_free_req(req);
}
-static unsigned io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool noflush)
+static unsigned io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
- if (test_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow)) {
- /*
- * noflush == true is from the waitqueue handler, just ensure
- * we wake up the task, and the next invocation will flush the
- * entries. We cannot safely to it from here.
- */
- if (noflush)
- return -1U;
-
- io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
- }
-
/* See comment at the top of this file */
smp_rmb();
return __io_cqring_events(ctx);
@@ -2552,7 +2554,9 @@ static int io_iopoll_check(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, long min)
* If we do, we can potentially be spinning for commands that
* already triggered a CQE (eg in error).
*/
- if (io_cqring_events(ctx, false))
+ if (test_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow))
+ __io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
+ if (io_cqring_events(ctx))
break;
/*
@@ -6827,7 +6831,7 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr)
/* if we have a backlog and couldn't flush it all, return BUSY */
if (test_bit(0, &ctx->sq_check_overflow)) {
- if (!io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL))
+ if (!__io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL))
return -EBUSY;
}
@@ -7090,7 +7094,7 @@ struct io_wait_queue {
unsigned nr_timeouts;
};
-static inline bool io_should_wake(struct io_wait_queue *iowq, bool noflush)
+static inline bool io_should_wake(struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = iowq->ctx;
@@ -7099,7 +7103,7 @@ static inline bool io_should_wake(struct io_wait_queue *iowq, bool noflush)
* started waiting. For timeouts, we always want to return to userspace,
* regardless of event count.
*/
- return io_cqring_events(ctx, noflush) >= iowq->to_wait ||
+ return io_cqring_events(ctx) >= iowq->to_wait ||
atomic_read(&ctx->cq_timeouts) != iowq->nr_timeouts;
}
@@ -7109,11 +7113,13 @@ static int io_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *curr, unsigned int mode,
struct io_wait_queue *iowq = container_of(curr, struct io_wait_queue,
wq);
- /* use noflush == true, as we can't safely rely on locking context */
- if (!io_should_wake(iowq, true))
- return -1;
-
- return autoremove_wake_function(curr, mode, wake_flags, key);
+ /*
+ * Cannot safely flush overflowed CQEs from here, ensure we wake up
+ * the task, and the next invocation will do it.
+ */
+ if (io_should_wake(iowq) || test_bit(0, &iowq->ctx->cq_check_overflow))
+ return autoremove_wake_function(curr, mode, wake_flags, key);
+ return -1;
}
static int io_run_task_work_sig(void)
@@ -7150,7 +7156,8 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
int ret = 0;
do {
- if (io_cqring_events(ctx, false) >= min_events)
+ io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
+ if (io_cqring_events(ctx) >= min_events)
return 0;
if (!io_run_task_work())
break;
@@ -7178,6 +7185,7 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
iowq.nr_timeouts = atomic_read(&ctx->cq_timeouts);
trace_io_uring_cqring_wait(ctx, min_events);
do {
+ io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&ctx->wait, &iowq.wq,
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
/* make sure we run task_work before checking for signals */
@@ -7186,8 +7194,10 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
continue;
else if (ret < 0)
break;
- if (io_should_wake(&iowq, false))
+ if (io_should_wake(&iowq))
break;
+ if (test_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow))
+ continue;
if (uts) {
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
if (timeout == 0) {
@@ -8625,7 +8635,8 @@ static __poll_t io_uring_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
smp_rmb();
if (!io_sqring_full(ctx))
mask |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
- if (io_cqring_events(ctx, false))
+ io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
+ if (io_cqring_events(ctx))
mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
return mask;
@@ -8683,7 +8694,7 @@ static void io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
/* if force is set, the ring is going away. always drop after that */
ctx->cq_overflow_flushed = 1;
if (ctx->rings)
- io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, NULL, NULL);
+ __io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, NULL, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
io_kill_timeouts(ctx, NULL, NULL);
@@ -8857,9 +8868,7 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_task_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
}
io_cancel_defer_files(ctx, task, files);
- io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL));
io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, task, files);
- io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL));
if (!files)
__io_uring_cancel_task_requests(ctx, task);
@@ -9195,13 +9204,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
*/
ret = 0;
if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) {
- if (!list_empty_careful(&ctx->cq_overflow_list)) {
- bool needs_lock = ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL;
+ io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
- io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, needs_lock);
- io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
- io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, needs_lock);
- }
if (flags & IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAKEUP)
wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
if (flags & IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAIT)
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 20:36 [PATCH 0/2] iopoll sync fixes Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 20:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 20:36 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-01-04 22:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] iopoll sync fixes Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b11b0ab3920e4da79ce54e565cfb2b7f4ebbc0d3.1609789890.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox