From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring: handle short reads internally
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:08:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 8/13/20 2:49 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jens Axboe <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On 8/13/20 2:37 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 8/13/20 2:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 8/13/20 2:25 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>>>> Jens Axboe <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Since we've had a few cases of applications not dealing with this
>>>>>> appopriately, I believe the safest course of action is to ensure that
>>>>>> we don't return short reads when we really don't have to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first patch is just a prep patch that retains iov_iter state over
>>>>>> retries, while the second one actually enables just doing retries if
>>>>>> we get a short read back.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you run this through the liburing regression tests?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tests <eeed8b54e0df-test> <timeout-overflow> <read-write> failed
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll take a look at the failures, but wanted to bring it to your
>>>>> attention sooner rather than later. I was using your io_uring-5.9
>>>>> branch.
>>>>
>>>> The eed8b54e0df-test failure is known with this one, pretty sure it
>>>> was always racy, but I'm looking into it.
>>>>
>>>> The timeout-overflow test needs fixing, it's just an ordering thing
>>>> with the batched completions done through submit. Not new with these
>>>> patches.
>
> OK.
>
>>>> The read-write one I'm interested in, what did you run it on? And
>>>> what was the failure?
>>>
>>> BTW, what git sha did you run?
>>
>> I do see a failure with dm on that, I'll take a look.
>
> I ran it on a file system atop nvme with 8 poll queues.
>
> liburing head: 9e1d69e078ee51f253a829ff421b17cfc996d158
> linux-block head: ff1353802d86a9d8e40ef1377efb12a1d3000a20
Fixed it, and actually enabled a further cleanup.
> The error I saw was:
>
> Running test read-write:
> Non-vectored IO not supported, skipping
> cqe res -22, wanted 2048
> test_buf_select_short vec failed
> Test read-write failed with ret 1
>
> But I don't think it was due to these two commits.
Yeah don't think so either.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-13 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-13 17:56 [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring: handle short reads internally Jens Axboe
2020-08-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: retain iov_iter state over io_read/io_write calls Jens Axboe
2020-08-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: internally retry short reads Jens Axboe
2020-08-13 20:25 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring: handle short reads internally Jeff Moyer
2020-08-13 20:33 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-13 20:37 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-13 20:41 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-13 20:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-08-13 22:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-08-13 22:21 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-08-13 22:31 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-17 20:55 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-08-17 20:57 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-18 17:55 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-08-18 18:00 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-18 18:07 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-08-18 18:10 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox