From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>, fstests <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: generic/471 regression with async buffered writes?
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:00:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yv5quvRMZXlDXED/@magnolia>
On 8/18/22 10:37 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I noticed the following fstest failure on XFS on 6.0-rc1 that wasn't
> there in 5.19:
>
> --- generic/471.out
> +++ generic/471.out.bad
> @@ -2,12 +2,10 @@
> pwrite: Resource temporarily unavailable
> wrote 8388608/8388608 bytes at offset 0
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -RWF_NOWAIT time is within limits.
> +pwrite: Resource temporarily unavailable
> +(standard_in) 1: syntax error
> +RWF_NOWAIT took seconds
> 00000000: aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa ................
> *
> -00200000: bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ................
> -*
> -00300000: aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa ................
> -*
> read 8388608/8388608 bytes at offset 0
> XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
>
> Is this related to the async buffered write changes, or should I keep
> looking? AFAICT nobody else has mentioned problems with 471...
The test is just broken. It made some odd assumptions on what RWF_NOWAIT
means with buffered writes. There's been a discussion on it previously,
I'll see if I can find the links. IIRC, the tldr is that the test
doesn't really tie RWF_NOWAIT to whether we'll block or not.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 16:37 generic/471 regression with async buffered writes? Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-18 17:00 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox