From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DD0C46467 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229717AbjARQBa (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:01:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33640 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230479AbjARP7c (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:59:32 -0500 Received: from mail-oa1-x2d.google.com (mail-oa1-x2d.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F394258642 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa1-x2d.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-12c8312131fso35947549fac.4 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:56:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TnZWFcWmNxBYxlm36v8cfD5yZDpkKQ0aC3UZSD0jltk=; b=wj7S76lZhgHNR/wz3qfMP29apc9hMbtbb5WF2C14Bo++5qkvJ4e7cUbAUDGb9J8QCX dzSYBgXtRaI++DQRqSSnYNv4SrPLLoVODS8JWIRHGIHcR24PSlF8sq5bNoyRdh8yv11i ATgVH2qgsjkEIuGwgsnQQ2woSpnbZ52db2BBqubVJuLYazxHpNBeE6rgv/hoU+sdGeAl jGCKsQIYzIkT8m8OYTEmlcQIt+IXAglqZv1DhGOuTztsGG/Ene1Ox27Si18bdlJal0Sa KiNNb73l/YhY8HBEaMZgGsFEny0fGoERIWiUzrpAw0MpO9tp8jaWbCcb7duo6AvCQFBx I+BA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TnZWFcWmNxBYxlm36v8cfD5yZDpkKQ0aC3UZSD0jltk=; b=nS9jlqLMwDog1ryVFrrkm37vDbwf+eqJ0KIs/zG0rFnGcnGA4sQ2Mq6w3pNMFhn/HA hRFfbsbD6SyrhA5sVsRbh2+raMvLEoC679ztDZ4Q6XgQLxbtsHfB1XyT/TvFpMingHi/ GJqjE2fmWve8XzLBTjukRzcMdi5tVic9haDEFZDkRQ+xoClDnbMlGgMyqcjvTOZ1Hmyx EwZdm00uuZqevs/bzCglHDqvGLbIPIIaWG7DFT4El4ig+o7kZoHZ2/rEig8ZT3u+CZ// SLWHsWhPusR9dOQQ1ZFDIH8UUExUGL1C3SJU6PuX2oSHfJbcz9/GjTIiAAbaVhpol11C sMOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqc9dnWuqoMRLJ611kVF8ORFqsRpcdA44W6jIEnA4WB/u0ycEpm FxSD+p+ZZAxodBnkhcWCVZ/m/E/yiFpZsopG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtO0qt6CqcaBM6jnu8tk2EWZ2JoCctBJbQ+Cucb0k7ebKS2GvCT120dezrjMJvHRCuOSiXiYw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:9564:b0:15b:a3dc:d5f6 with SMTP id v36-20020a056870956400b0015ba3dcd5f6mr789144oal.3.1674057377075; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.94] ([207.135.234.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5-20020a4aaa85000000b004cb050fd09fsm16663392oon.29.2023.01.18.07.56.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:56:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:56:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: Problems replacing epoll with io_uring in tevent Content-Language: en-US To: Stefan Metzmacher Cc: Samba Technical , Linus Torvalds , io-uring References: <949fdb8e-bd12-03dc-05c6-c972f26ec0ec@samba.org> <270f3b9a-8fa6-68bf-7c57-277f107167c9@kernel.dk> <2a9e4484-4025-2806-89c3-51c590cfd176@samba.org> <60ce8938-77ed-0b43-0852-7895140c3553@samba.org> <79b3e423-16aa-48f1-ee27-a198c2db2ba8@samba.org> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <79b3e423-16aa-48f1-ee27-a198c2db2ba8@samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 12/28/22 9:19?AM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote: > Hi Jens, > > any change to get some feedback on these? > https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/60ce8938-77ed-0b43-0852-7895140c3553@samba.org/ > and > https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/c9a5b180-322c-1eb6-2392-df9370aeb45c@samba.org/ > > Thanks in advance! Finally getting around to this after the break... I think your initial patch looks reasonable for doing cancel-on-close. Can you resubmit it against for-6.3/io_uring so we can get it moving forward, hopefully? That would also be a good point to discuss the fixed file case as well, as ideally this should obviously work on both types. -- Jens Axboe