From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Akilesh Kailash <akailash@google.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: bpf: add buffer support for IORING_OP_BPF
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 12:25:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b412ad25-27c4-44ec-bcaa-aeb21a64d657@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRW7VJT3xLjHkChj@fedora>
Am 13.11.25 um 12:04 schrieb Ming Lei:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 11:42:53AM +0100, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
>> Am 04.11.25 um 17:21 schrieb Ming Lei:
>>> Add support for passing 0-2 buffers to BPF operations through
>>> IORING_OP_BPF. Buffer types are encoded in sqe->bpf_op_flags
>>> using dedicated 3-bit fields for each buffer.
>>>
>>> Buffer 1 can be:
>>> - None (no buffer)
>>> - Plain user buffer (addr=sqe->addr, len=sqe->len)
>>> - Fixed/registered buffer (index=sqe->buf_index, offset=sqe->addr,
>>> len=sqe->len)
>>>
>>> Buffer 2 can be:
>>> - None (no buffer)
>>> - Plain user buffer (addr=sqe->addr3, len=sqe->optlen)
>>>
>>> The sqe->bpf_op_flags layout (32 bits):
>>> Bits 31-24: BPF operation ID (8 bits)
>>> Bits 23-21: Buffer 1 type (3 bits)
>>> Bits 20-18: Buffer 2 type (3 bits)
>>> Bits 17-0: Custom BPF flags (18 bits)
>>>
>>> Using 3-bit encoding for each buffer type allows for future
>>> expansion to 8 types (0-7). Currently types 0-2 are defined
>>> (none/plain/fixed) and 3-7 are reserved for future use.
>>>
>>> Buffer 2 currently only supports none/plain types because the
>>> io_uring framework can only handle one fixed buffer per request
>>> (via req->buf_index). The 3-bit encoding provides room for
>>> future enhancements.
>>>
>>> Buffer metadata (addresses, lengths) is stored in the extended
>>> uring_bpf_data structure and is accessible to BPF programs with
>>> readonly permissions. Buffer types can be extracted from the opf
>>> field using IORING_BPF_BUF1_TYPE() and IORING_BPF_BUF2_TYPE()
>>> macros.
>>>
>>> Valid buffer combinations:
>>> - 0 buffers
>>> - 1 plain buffer
>>> - 1 fixed buffer
>>> - 2 plain buffers
>>> - 1 fixed buffer + 1 plain buffer
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> io_uring/bpf.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> io_uring/uring_bpf.h | 12 ++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>> index 94d2050131ac..950f4cfbbf86 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>> @@ -429,12 +429,53 @@ enum io_uring_op {
>>> #define IORING_SEND_VECTORIZED (1U << 5)
>>> /*
>>> - * sqe->bpf_op_flags top 8bits is for storing bpf op
>>> - * The other 24bits are used for bpf prog
>>> + * sqe->bpf_op_flags layout (32 bits total):
>>> + * Bits 31-24: BPF operation ID (8 bits, 256 possible operations)
>>> + * Bits 23-21: Buffer 1 type (3 bits: none/plain/fixed/reserved)
>>> + * Bits 20-18: Buffer 2 type (3 bits: none/plain/reserved)
>>> + * Bits 17-0: Custom BPF flags (18 bits, available for BPF programs)
>>> + *
>>> + * For IORING_OP_BPF, buffers are specified as follows:
>>> + * Buffer 1 (plain): addr=sqe->addr, len=sqe->len
>>> + * Buffer 1 (fixed): index=sqe->buf_index, offset=sqe->addr, len=sqe->len
>>> + * Buffer 2 (plain): addr=sqe->addr3, len=sqe->optlen
>>> + *
>>> + * Note: Buffer 1 can be none/plain/fixed. Buffer 2 can only be none/plain.
>>> + * 3-bit encoding for each buffer allows for future expansion to 8 types (0-7).
>>> + * Currently only one fixed buffer per request is supported (buffer 1).
>>> + * Valid combinations: 0 buffers, 1 plain, 1 fixed, 2 plain, 1 fixed + 1 plain.
>>> */
>>> #define IORING_BPF_OP_BITS (8)
>>> #define IORING_BPF_OP_SHIFT (24)
>>> +/* Buffer type encoding in sqe->bpf_op_flags */
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF1_TYPE_SHIFT (21)
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF2_TYPE_SHIFT (18)
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_NONE (0) /* No buffer */
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_PLAIN (1) /* Plain user buffer */
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_FIXED (2) /* Fixed/registered buffer */
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_MASK (7) /* 3-bit mask */
>>> +
>>> +/* Helper macros to encode/decode buffer types */
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF1_TYPE(flags) \
>>> + (((flags) >> IORING_BPF_BUF1_TYPE_SHIFT) & IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_MASK)
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_BUF2_TYPE(flags) \
>>> + (((flags) >> IORING_BPF_BUF2_TYPE_SHIFT) & IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_MASK)
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_SET_BUF1_TYPE(type) \
>>> + (((type) & IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_MASK) << IORING_BPF_BUF1_TYPE_SHIFT)
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_SET_BUF2_TYPE(type) \
>>> + (((type) & IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_MASK) << IORING_BPF_BUF2_TYPE_SHIFT)
>>> +
>>> +/* Custom BPF flags mask (18 bits available, bits 17-0) */
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_CUSTOM_FLAGS_MASK ((1U << 18) - 1)
>>> +
>>> +/* Encode all components into sqe->bpf_op_flags */
>>> +#define IORING_BPF_OP_FLAGS(op, buf1_type, buf2_type, flags) \
>>> + (((op) << IORING_BPF_OP_SHIFT) | \
>>> + IORING_BPF_SET_BUF1_TYPE(buf1_type) | \
>>> + IORING_BPF_SET_BUF2_TYPE(buf2_type) | \
>>> + ((flags) & IORING_BPF_CUSTOM_FLAGS_MASK))
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * cqe.res for IORING_CQE_F_NOTIF if
>>> * IORING_SEND_ZC_REPORT_USAGE was requested
>>> diff --git a/io_uring/bpf.c b/io_uring/bpf.c
>>> index 8227be6d5a10..e837c3d57b96 100644
>>> --- a/io_uring/bpf.c
>>> +++ b/io_uring/bpf.c
>>> @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@
>>> #include <linux/btf.h>
>>> #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
>>> #include <linux/filter.h>
>>> +#include <linux/uio.h>
>>> #include "io_uring.h"
>>> #include "uring_bpf.h"
>>> +#include "rsrc.h"
>>> #define MAX_BPF_OPS_COUNT (1 << IORING_BPF_OP_BITS)
>>> @@ -28,7 +30,7 @@ static inline unsigned char uring_bpf_get_op(unsigned int op_flags)
>>> static inline unsigned int uring_bpf_get_flags(unsigned int op_flags)
>>> {
>>> - return op_flags & ((1U << IORING_BPF_OP_SHIFT) - 1);
>>> + return op_flags & IORING_BPF_CUSTOM_FLAGS_MASK;
>>> }
>>> static inline struct uring_bpf_ops *uring_bpf_get_ops(struct uring_bpf_data *data)
>>> @@ -36,18 +38,77 @@ static inline struct uring_bpf_ops *uring_bpf_get_ops(struct uring_bpf_data *dat
>>> return &bpf_ops[uring_bpf_get_op(data->opf)];
>>> }
>>> +static int io_bpf_prep_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req,
>>> + const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
>>> + struct uring_bpf_data *data,
>>> + unsigned int op_flags)
>>> +{
>>> + u8 buf1_type, buf2_type;
>>> +
>>> + /* Extract buffer configuration from bpf_op_flags */
>>> + buf1_type = IORING_BPF_BUF1_TYPE(op_flags);
>>> + buf2_type = IORING_BPF_BUF2_TYPE(op_flags);
>>> +
>>> + /* Prepare buffer 1 */
>>> + if (buf1_type == IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_PLAIN) {
>>> + /* Plain user buffer: addr=sqe->addr, len=sqe->len */
>>> + data->buf1_addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
>>> + data->buf1_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
>>> + } else if (buf1_type == IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_FIXED) {
>>> + /* Fixed buffer: index=sqe->buf_index, offset=sqe->addr, len=sqe->len */
>>> + req->buf_index = READ_ONCE(sqe->buf_index);
>>> + data->buf1_addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr); /* offset within fixed buffer */
>>> + data->buf1_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
>>> +
>>> + /* Validate buffer index */
>>> + if (unlikely(!req->ctx->buf_table.nr))
>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>> + if (unlikely(req->buf_index >= req->ctx->buf_table.nr))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + } else if (buf1_type == IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_NONE) {
>>> + data->buf1_addr = 0;
>>> + data->buf1_len = 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Prepare buffer 2 (plain only - io_uring only supports one fixed buffer) */
>>> + if (buf2_type == IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_PLAIN) {
>>> + /* Plain user buffer: addr=sqe->addr3, len=sqe->optlen */
>>> + data->buf2_addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr3);
>>> + data->buf2_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->optlen);
>>> + } else if (buf2_type == IORING_BPF_BUF_TYPE_NONE) {
>>> + data->buf2_addr = 0;
>>> + data->buf2_len = 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> int io_uring_bpf_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>>> {
>>> struct uring_bpf_data *data = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct uring_bpf_data);
>>> unsigned int op_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->bpf_op_flags);
>>> struct uring_bpf_ops *ops;
>>> + int ret;
>>> if (!(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_BPF))
>>> return -EACCES;
>>> + if (uring_bpf_get_flags(op_flags))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> data->opf = op_flags;
>>> ops = &bpf_ops[uring_bpf_get_op(data->opf)];
>>> + /* Prepare buffers based on buffer type flags */
>>> + ret = io_bpf_prep_buffers(req, sqe, data, op_flags);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> if (ops->prep_fn)
>>> return ops->prep_fn(data, sqe);
>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> diff --git a/io_uring/uring_bpf.h b/io_uring/uring_bpf.h
>>> index c76eba887d22..c919931cb4b0 100644
>>> --- a/io_uring/uring_bpf.h
>>> +++ b/io_uring/uring_bpf.h
>>> @@ -7,8 +7,18 @@ struct uring_bpf_data {
>>> struct file *file;
>>> u32 opf;
>>> + /* Buffer 1 metadata - readable for bpf prog */
>>> + u32 buf1_len; /* buffer 1 length, bytes 12-15 */
>>> + u64 buf1_addr; /* buffer 1 address or offset, bytes 16-23 */
>>> +
>>> + /* Buffer 2 metadata - readable for bpf prog (plain only) */
>>> + u64 buf2_addr; /* buffer 2 address, bytes 24-31 */
>>> + u32 buf2_len; /* buffer 2 length, bytes 32-35 */
>>> + u32 __pad; /* padding, bytes 36-39 */
>>
>> I'm wondering if this should be in the generic struct uring_bpf_data
>> at all. For io_uring_cmd we have helper functions like
>> io_uring_cmd_import_fixed[_vec] which can be used by the implementation,
>> but the layout on top of io_uring_cmd->pdu is up to the
>> specific operation.
>
> Actually all above are not necessary, I plan to remove all in V2 because
> data can be passed via arena map easily & efficiently, and all kinds of
> buffer(plain user, fixed, vectored, fixed vectored) handing can leave to
> kfunc.
Ok, I guess I can learn a lot from the next version and its
examples :-)
>> Thinking about it, I'm wondering if the bpf operations
>> could be implemented on top of io_uring_cmd.
>
> It could be one mess for uring_cmd which should focus on in-tree kernel
> users, not see obvious benefit, IMO.
Yes, I'm not saying we should do it, only that it would be possible...
metze
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 16:21 [PATCH 0/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_BPF for extending io_uring Ming Lei
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: prepare for extending io_uring with bpf Ming Lei
2025-12-31 1:13 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 9:33 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: bpf: add io_uring_ctx setup for BPF into one list Ming Lei
2025-12-31 1:13 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 9:49 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 16:19 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: bpf: extend io_uring with bpf struct_ops Ming Lei
2025-11-07 19:02 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-08 6:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-13 10:32 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2025-11-13 10:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-13 11:19 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2025-11-14 3:00 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-08 22:45 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-09 3:08 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-10 16:11 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-19 14:39 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-11-20 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-20 1:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 1:19 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 10:32 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 16:48 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: bpf: add buffer support for IORING_OP_BPF Ming Lei
2025-11-13 10:42 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2025-11-13 11:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-13 11:25 ` Stefan Metzmacher [this message]
2025-12-31 1:42 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 17:02 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: bpf: add io_uring_bpf_req_memcpy() kfunc Ming Lei
2025-11-07 18:51 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-31 1:42 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-05 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_BPF for extending io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-05 15:57 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-06 16:03 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-07 15:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-11 14:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-13 4:18 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-19 19:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b412ad25-27c4-44ec-bcaa-aeb21a64d657@samba.org \
--to=metze@samba.org \
--cc=akailash@google.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox