public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes
@ 2021-01-04  1:59 Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

v2:
- add 3/6 to trigger eventfd for iopoll
- add 5/6, yet another iopoll sync fix
- rework 6/6 (Jens)

Pavel Begunkov (6):
  io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel
  io_uring: cancel more aggressively in exit_work
  io_uring: trigger eventfd for IOPOLL
  io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock
  io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail
  io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync

 fs/io_uring.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/6] io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel
  2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
@ 2021-01-04  1:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] io_uring: cancel more aggressively in exit_work Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

io_uring fds marked O_CLOEXEC and we explicitly cancel all requests
before going through exec, so we don't want to leave task's file
references to not our anymore io_uring instances.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ca46f314640b..ee1beec7a04d 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8948,6 +8948,15 @@ static void io_uring_attempt_task_drop(struct file *file)
 		io_uring_del_task_file(file);
 }
 
+static void io_uring_remove_task_files(struct io_uring_task *tctx)
+{
+	struct file *file;
+	unsigned long index;
+
+	xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, file)
+		io_uring_del_task_file(file);
+}
+
 void __io_uring_files_cancel(struct files_struct *files)
 {
 	struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
@@ -8956,16 +8965,12 @@ void __io_uring_files_cancel(struct files_struct *files)
 
 	/* make sure overflow events are dropped */
 	atomic_inc(&tctx->in_idle);
-
-	xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, file) {
-		struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
-
-		io_uring_cancel_task_requests(ctx, files);
-		if (files)
-			io_uring_del_task_file(file);
-	}
-
+	xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, file)
+		io_uring_cancel_task_requests(file->private_data, files);
 	atomic_dec(&tctx->in_idle);
+
+	if (files)
+		io_uring_remove_task_files(tctx);
 }
 
 static s64 tctx_inflight(struct io_uring_task *tctx)
@@ -9028,6 +9033,8 @@ void __io_uring_task_cancel(void)
 	} while (1);
 
 	atomic_dec(&tctx->in_idle);
+
+	io_uring_remove_task_files(tctx);
 }
 
 static int io_uring_flush(struct file *file, void *data)
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/6] io_uring: cancel more aggressively in exit_work
  2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel Pavel Begunkov
@ 2021-01-04  1:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] io_uring: trigger eventfd for IOPOLL Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

While io_ring_exit_work() is running new requests of all sorts may be
issued, so it should do a bit more to cancel them, otherwise they may
just get stuck. e.g. in io-wq, in poll lists, etc.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ee1beec7a04d..cacb14246dbb 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -992,6 +992,9 @@ enum io_mem_account {
 	ACCT_PINNED,
 };
 
+static void __io_uring_cancel_task_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+					    struct task_struct *task);
+
 static void destroy_fixed_file_ref_node(struct fixed_file_ref_node *ref_node);
 static struct fixed_file_ref_node *alloc_fixed_file_ref_node(
 			struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
@@ -8663,7 +8666,7 @@ static void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	 * as nobody else will be looking for them.
 	 */
 	do {
-		io_iopoll_try_reap_events(ctx);
+		__io_uring_cancel_task_requests(ctx, NULL);
 	} while (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->ref_comp, HZ/20));
 	io_ring_ctx_free(ctx);
 }
@@ -8818,9 +8821,11 @@ static void __io_uring_cancel_task_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 		enum io_wq_cancel cret;
 		bool ret = false;
 
-		cret = io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_cancel_task_cb, &cancel, true);
-		if (cret != IO_WQ_CANCEL_NOTFOUND)
-			ret = true;
+		if (ctx->io_wq) {
+			cret = io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_cancel_task_cb,
+					       &cancel, true);
+			ret |= (cret != IO_WQ_CANCEL_NOTFOUND);
+		}
 
 		/* SQPOLL thread does its own polling */
 		if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)) {
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/6] io_uring: trigger eventfd for IOPOLL
  2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] io_uring: cancel more aggressively in exit_work Pavel Begunkov
@ 2021-01-04  1:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

Make sure io_iopoll_complete() tries to wake up eventfd, which currently
is skipped together with io_cqring_ev_posted() for non-SQPOLL IOPOLL.

Add an iopoll version of io_cqring_ev_posted(), duplicates a bit of
code, but they actually use different sets of wait queues may be for
better.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index cacb14246dbb..2beb1e72302d 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1715,6 +1715,16 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 		eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
 }
 
+static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) {
+		if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->wait))
+			wake_up(&ctx->wait);
+	}
+	if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
+		eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+}
+
 /* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
 static bool io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
 				     struct task_struct *tsk,
@@ -2427,8 +2437,7 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 	}
 
 	io_commit_cqring(ctx);
-	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)
-		io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+	io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(ctx);
 	io_req_free_batch_finish(ctx, &rb);
 
 	if (!list_empty(&again))
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 4/6] io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock
  2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] io_uring: trigger eventfd for IOPOLL Pavel Begunkov
@ 2021-01-04  1:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring; +Cc: syzbot+91ca3f25bd7f795f019c

      CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&new->fa_lock);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
                               lock(&new->fa_lock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&ctx->completion_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

Move kill_fasync() out of io_commit_cqring() to io_cqring_ev_posted(),
so it doesn't hold completion_lock while doing it. That saves from the
reported deadlock, and it's just nice to shorten the locking time and
untangle nested locks (compl_lock -> wq_head::lock).

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 2beb1e72302d..9c554adf3993 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1345,11 +1345,6 @@ static void __io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 
 	/* order cqe stores with ring update */
 	smp_store_release(&rings->cq.tail, ctx->cached_cq_tail);
-
-	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
-		wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
-		kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
-	}
 }
 
 static void io_put_identity(struct io_uring_task *tctx, struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -1713,6 +1708,10 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 		wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
 	if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
 		eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
+		wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
+		kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+	}
 }
 
 static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -1723,6 +1722,10 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	}
 	if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
 		eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
+		wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
+		kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+	}
 }
 
 /* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 5/6] io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail
  2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock Pavel Begunkov
@ 2021-01-04  1:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

io_req_task_submit() might be called for IOPOLL, do the fail path under
uring_lock to comply with IOPOLL synchronisation based solely on it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 9c554adf3993..1c32d4700caf 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2143,14 +2143,14 @@ static void __io_req_task_submit(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 
+	mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 	if (!__io_sq_thread_acquire_mm(ctx) &&
 	    !__io_sq_thread_acquire_files(ctx)) {
-		mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 		__io_queue_sqe(req, NULL);
-		mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 	} else {
 		__io_req_task_cancel(req, -EFAULT);
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 }
 
 static void io_req_task_submit(struct callback_head *cb)
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 6/6] io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync
  2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail Pavel Begunkov
@ 2021-01-04  1:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2021-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

IOPOLL skips completion locking but keeps it under uring_lock, thus
io_cqring_overflow_flush() and so io_cqring_events() need additional
locking with uring_lock in some cases for IOPOLL.

Remove __io_cqring_overflow_flush() from io_cqring_events(), introduce a
wrapper around flush doing needed synchronisation and call it by hand.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 1c32d4700caf..ed13642b56bc 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1729,9 +1729,9 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 }
 
 /* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
-static bool io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
-				     struct task_struct *tsk,
-				     struct files_struct *files)
+static bool __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
+				       struct task_struct *tsk,
+				       struct files_struct *files)
 {
 	struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings;
 	struct io_kiocb *req, *tmp;
@@ -1784,6 +1784,20 @@ static bool io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
 	return all_flushed;
 }
 
+static void io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
+				     struct task_struct *tsk,
+				     struct files_struct *files)
+{
+	if (test_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow)) {
+		/* iopoll syncs against uring_lock, not completion_lock */
+		if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)
+			mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+		__io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, force, tsk, files);
+		if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)
+			mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+	}
+}
+
 static void __io_cqring_fill_event(struct io_kiocb *req, long res, long cflags)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -2329,20 +2343,8 @@ static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		io_free_req(req);
 }
 
-static unsigned io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool noflush)
+static unsigned io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	if (test_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow)) {
-		/*
-		 * noflush == true is from the waitqueue handler, just ensure
-		 * we wake up the task, and the next invocation will flush the
-		 * entries. We cannot safely to it from here.
-		 */
-		if (noflush)
-			return -1U;
-
-		io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
-	}
-
 	/* See comment at the top of this file */
 	smp_rmb();
 	return __io_cqring_events(ctx);
@@ -2566,7 +2568,8 @@ static int io_iopoll_check(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, long min)
 		 * If we do, we can potentially be spinning for commands that
 		 * already triggered a CQE (eg in error).
 		 */
-		if (io_cqring_events(ctx, false))
+		__io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
+		if (io_cqring_events(ctx))
 			break;
 
 		/*
@@ -6841,7 +6844,7 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr)
 
 	/* if we have a backlog and couldn't flush it all, return BUSY */
 	if (test_bit(0, &ctx->sq_check_overflow)) {
-		if (!io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL))
+		if (!__io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL))
 			return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
@@ -7104,7 +7107,7 @@ struct io_wait_queue {
 	unsigned nr_timeouts;
 };
 
-static inline bool io_should_wake(struct io_wait_queue *iowq, bool noflush)
+static inline bool io_should_wake(struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = iowq->ctx;
 
@@ -7113,7 +7116,7 @@ static inline bool io_should_wake(struct io_wait_queue *iowq, bool noflush)
 	 * started waiting. For timeouts, we always want to return to userspace,
 	 * regardless of event count.
 	 */
-	return io_cqring_events(ctx, noflush) >= iowq->to_wait ||
+	return io_cqring_events(ctx) >= iowq->to_wait ||
 			atomic_read(&ctx->cq_timeouts) != iowq->nr_timeouts;
 }
 
@@ -7123,11 +7126,13 @@ static int io_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *curr, unsigned int mode,
 	struct io_wait_queue *iowq = container_of(curr, struct io_wait_queue,
 							wq);
 
-	/* use noflush == true, as we can't safely rely on locking context */
-	if (!io_should_wake(iowq, true))
-		return -1;
-
-	return autoremove_wake_function(curr, mode, wake_flags, key);
+	/*
+	 * Cannot safely flush overflowed CQEs from here, ensure we wake up
+	 * the task, and the next invocation will do it.
+	 */
+	if (io_should_wake(iowq) || test_bit(0, &iowq->ctx->cq_check_overflow))
+		return autoremove_wake_function(curr, mode, wake_flags, key);
+	return -1;
 }
 
 static int io_run_task_work_sig(void)
@@ -7164,7 +7169,8 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	do {
-		if (io_cqring_events(ctx, false) >= min_events)
+		io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
+		if (io_cqring_events(ctx) >= min_events)
 			return 0;
 		if (!io_run_task_work())
 			break;
@@ -7192,6 +7198,7 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
 	iowq.nr_timeouts = atomic_read(&ctx->cq_timeouts);
 	trace_io_uring_cqring_wait(ctx, min_events);
 	do {
+		io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
 		prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&ctx->wait, &iowq.wq,
 						TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		/* make sure we run task_work before checking for signals */
@@ -7200,8 +7207,11 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
 			continue;
 		else if (ret < 0)
 			break;
-		if (io_should_wake(&iowq, false))
+		if (io_should_wake(&iowq))
 			break;
+		if (test_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow))
+			continue;
+
 		if (uts) {
 			timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
 			if (timeout == 0) {
@@ -8639,7 +8649,8 @@ static __poll_t io_uring_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 	smp_rmb();
 	if (!io_sqring_full(ctx))
 		mask |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
-	if (io_cqring_events(ctx, false))
+	io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
+	if (io_cqring_events(ctx))
 		mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
 
 	return mask;
@@ -8697,7 +8708,7 @@ static void io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	/* if force is set, the ring is going away. always drop after that */
 	ctx->cq_overflow_flushed = 1;
 	if (ctx->rings)
-		io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, NULL, NULL);
+		__io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, NULL, NULL);
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 
 	io_kill_timeouts(ctx, NULL, NULL);
@@ -8873,9 +8884,7 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_task_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 	}
 
 	io_cancel_defer_files(ctx, task, files);
-	io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL));
 	io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, task, files);
-	io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL));
 
 	if (!files)
 		__io_uring_cancel_task_requests(ctx, task);
@@ -9218,13 +9227,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
 	 */
 	ret = 0;
 	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) {
-		if (!list_empty_careful(&ctx->cq_overflow_list)) {
-			bool needs_lock = ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL;
+		io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
 
-			io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, needs_lock);
-			io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, false, NULL, NULL);
-			io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, needs_lock);
-		}
 		if (flags & IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAKEUP)
 			wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
 		if (flags & IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAIT)
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes
  2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync Pavel Begunkov
@ 2021-01-04 16:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2021-01-04 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

On 04/01/2021 01:59, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> v2:
> - add 3/6 to trigger eventfd for iopoll
> - add 5/6, yet another iopoll sync fix
> - rework 6/6 (Jens)

I'll go with v3, probably splitting the series.
Apart from small changes I want to add, during long runs,
it kills tests with SIGINT, mainly 500f9fbadef8-test.
Any ideas what it can be?

> 
> Pavel Begunkov (6):
>   io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel
>   io_uring: cancel more aggressively in exit_work
>   io_uring: trigger eventfd for IOPOLL
>   io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock
>   io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail
>   io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync
> 
>  fs/io_uring.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-04 16:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-04  1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] io_uring: cancel more aggressively in exit_work Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] io_uring: trigger eventfd for IOPOLL Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04  1:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox