public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]>
To: "Alexander V. Buev" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	Mikhail Malygin <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] block: bio-integrity: add PI iovec to bio
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:49:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 2/10/22 5:08 AM, Alexander V. Buev wrote:
> Added functions to attach user PI iovec pages to bio
> and release this pages via bio_integrity_free.
> 

consider :-

Added functions to attach user PI iovec pages to bio and release this
pages via bio_integrity_free.

> Signed-off-by: Alexander V. Buev <[email protected]>
> ---
>   block/bio-integrity.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/bio.h   |   8 +++
>   2 files changed, 159 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c
> index 0827b19820c5..8e57aea9c9eb 100644
> --- a/block/bio-integrity.c
> +++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>   #include <linux/mempool.h>
>   #include <linux/export.h>
>   #include <linux/bio.h>
> +#include <linux/uio.h>
>   #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include "blk.h"
> @@ -91,6 +92,19 @@ struct bio_integrity_payload *bio_integrity_alloc(struct bio *bio,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_integrity_alloc);
>   
> +void bio_integrity_release_pages(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio_integrity(bio);
> +	unsigned short i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < bip->bip_vcnt; ++i) {

++i is common in kernel code..

> +		struct bio_vec *bv;
> +
> +		bv = bip->bip_vec + i;

is it possible to bip->bip_vec++ instead of above ?

> +		put_page(bv->bv_page);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * bio_integrity_free - Free bio integrity payload
>    * @bio:	bio containing bip to be freed
> @@ -105,6 +119,10 @@ void bio_integrity_free(struct bio *bio)
>   
>   	if (bip->bip_flags & BIP_BLOCK_INTEGRITY)
>   		kfree(bvec_virt(bip->bip_vec));
> +	else {
> +		if (bip->bip_flags & BIP_RELEASE_PAGES)
> +			bio_integrity_release_pages(bio);
> +	}
>   

why not use if() ... else if () {} ?

>   	__bio_integrity_free(bs, bip);
>   	bio->bi_integrity = NULL;
> @@ -377,6 +395,139 @@ void bio_integrity_advance(struct bio *bio, unsigned int bytes_done)
>   	bvec_iter_advance(bip->bip_vec, &bip->bip_iter, bytes);
>   }
>   
> +static inline
> +struct page **__bio_integrity_temp_pages(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_needed_page)
> +{
> +	struct page **pages = 0;

use of NULL please and reverse tree order declaration ..

> +	unsigned int nr_avail_page;
> +	struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio_integrity(bio);
> +
> +	if (bip->bip_max_vcnt > nr_needed_page) {
> +		nr_avail_page = (bip->bip_max_vcnt - nr_needed_page) *
> +			sizeof(struct bio_vec)/sizeof(struct page *);
> +	} else
> +		nr_avail_page = 0;
> +

I'd initialize nr_avail_pages at the time of declaration and remove else
part.

> +	if (nr_avail_page >= nr_needed_page)
> +		pages = (struct page **) (bip->bip_vec + nr_needed_page);
> +	else {
> +		if (bio->bi_max_vecs - bio->bi_vcnt) {
> +			nr_avail_page = (bio->bi_max_vecs - bio->bi_vcnt) *
> +				sizeof(struct bio_vec)/sizeof(struct page *);
> +			if (nr_avail_page >= nr_needed_page)
> +				pages = (struct page **) (bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt);
> +		}
> +	}
> +

How about following much clear and removes need for else part ?

         if (nr_avail_page >= nr_needed_page)
                 return (struct page **) (bip->bip_vec + 
nr_needed_page);

         if (bio->bi_max_vecs - bio->bi_vcnt) {
                 nr_avail_page = (bio->bi_max_vecs - bio->bi_vcnt) *
                         sizeof(struct bio_vec)/sizeof(struct page *);
                 if (nr_avail_page >= nr_needed_page)
                         return (struct page **) (bio->bi_io_vec + 
bio->bi_vcnt);
         }

         return NULL;

I think if you use above then we don't have to need pages variable on
the stack in the fast path.

> +	return pages;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * bio_integrity_add_iovec - Add PI io vector
> + * @bio:	bio whose integrity vector to update
> + * @pi_iter:	iov_iter pointed to data added to @bio's integrity
> + *
> + * Description: Pins pages for *pi_iov and appends them to @bio's integrity.
> + */
> +int bio_integrity_add_iovec(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *pi_iter)
> +{
> +	struct blk_integrity *bi = bdev_get_integrity(bio->bi_bdev);
> +	struct bio_integrity_payload *bip;
> +	struct page **pi_page = 0, **bio_page;
> +	unsigned int nr_vec_page, intervals;
> +	int ret;
> +	ssize_t size;
> +	size_t offset, len, pg_num, page_count;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!bi && bi->tuple_size && bi->interval_exp)) {
> +		pr_err("Device is not integrity capable");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	intervals = bio_integrity_intervals(bi, bio_sectors(bio));
> +	if (unlikely(intervals * bi->tuple_size < pi_iter->count)) {
> +		pr_err("Intervals number is wrong, intervals=%u, tuple_size=%u, pi_len=%zu",
> +			intervals, bi->tuple_size, pi_iter->count);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	nr_vec_page = (pi_iter->count + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	/* data of size N pages can be pinned to N+1 page */
> +	nr_vec_page += 1;
> +
> +	bip = bio_integrity_alloc(bio, GFP_NOIO, nr_vec_page);
> +	if (IS_ERR(bip))
> +		return PTR_ERR(bip);
> +
> +	/* get space for page pointers array */
> +	bio_page = __bio_integrity_temp_pages(bio, nr_vec_page);
> +
> +	if (likely(bio_page))
> +		pi_page = bio_page;
> +	else {
> +		pi_page = kcalloc(nr_vec_page, sizeof(struct pi_page *), GFP_NOIO);

overlay long line above..

> +		if (!pi_page) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto error;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	bip->bip_iter.bi_size = pi_iter->count;
> +	bip->bio_iter = bio->bi_iter;
> +	bip_set_seed(bip, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> +
> +	if (bi->flags & BLK_INTEGRITY_IP_CHECKSUM)
> +		bip->bip_flags |= BIP_IP_CHECKSUM;
> +
> +	size = iov_iter_get_pages(pi_iter, pi_page, LONG_MAX, nr_vec_page, &offset);

same as above comment...

> +	if (unlikely(size <= 0)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to pin PI buffer to page (%zi)", size);
> +		ret = (size) ? size : -EFAULT;
> +		goto error;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* calc count of pined pages */
> +	if (size > (PAGE_SIZE - offset))
> +		page_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(size - (PAGE_SIZE - offset), PAGE_SIZE) + 1;
> +	else
> +		page_count = 1;
> +
> +	/* fill bio integrity biovecs the given pages */
> +	len = pi_iter->count;
> +	for (pg_num = 0; pg_num < page_count; ++pg_num) {
> +		size_t page_len;
> +
> +		page_len = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> +		if (page_len > len)
> +			page_len = len;
> +		ret = bio_integrity_add_page(bio, pi_page[pg_num], page_len, offset);
> +		if (unlikely(ret != page_len)) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto error;
> +		}
> +		len -= page_len;
> +		offset = 0;
> +		bip->bip_flags |= BIP_RELEASE_PAGES;
> +	}
> +
> +	iov_iter_advance(pi_iter, size);
> +
> +	if (pi_page != bio_page)
> +		kfree(pi_page);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +error:
> +	if (bio_integrity(bio))
> +		bio_integrity_free(bio);
> +
> +	if (pi_page && pi_page != bio_page)
> +		kfree(pi_page);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_integrity_add_iovec);
> +
>   /**
>    * bio_integrity_trim - Trim integrity vector
>    * @bio:	bio whose integrity vector to update
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index 117d7f248ac9..ce008eeeb160 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ enum bip_flags {
>   	BIP_CTRL_NOCHECK	= 1 << 2, /* disable HBA integrity checking */
>   	BIP_DISK_NOCHECK	= 1 << 3, /* disable disk integrity checking */
>   	BIP_IP_CHECKSUM		= 1 << 4, /* IP checksum */
> +	BIP_RELEASE_PAGES	= 1 << 5, /* release pages after io completion */
>   };
>   
>   /*
> @@ -707,6 +708,7 @@ extern struct bio_integrity_payload *bio_integrity_alloc(struct bio *, gfp_t, un
>   extern int bio_integrity_add_page(struct bio *, struct page *, unsigned int, unsigned int);
>   extern bool bio_integrity_prep(struct bio *);
>   extern void bio_integrity_advance(struct bio *, unsigned int);
> +extern int bio_integrity_add_iovec(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter);

can we drop extern keyword ?

>   extern void bio_integrity_trim(struct bio *);
>   extern int bio_integrity_clone(struct bio *, struct bio *, gfp_t);
>   extern int bioset_integrity_create(struct bio_set *, int);
> @@ -747,6 +749,12 @@ static inline void bio_integrity_advance(struct bio *bio,
>   	return;
>   }
>   
> +static inline int bio_integrity_add_iovec(struct bio *bio,
> +					struct iov_iter *pi_iter)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static inline void bio_integrity_trim(struct bio *bio)
>   {
>   	return;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10 13:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] implement direct IO with integrity Alexander V. Buev
2022-02-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: bio-integrity: add PI iovec to bio Alexander V. Buev
2022-02-10 17:49   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2022-02-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: io_uring: add READV_PI/WRITEV_PI operations Alexander V. Buev
2022-02-10 15:39   ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-10 19:03     ` Alexander V. Buev
2022-02-10 19:07       ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-11  9:39         ` Alexander V. Buev
2022-02-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block: fops: handle IOCB_USE_PI in direct IO Alexander V. Buev
2022-02-10 17:53   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox