From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot recv
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:15:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 9/14/23 7:02 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 9/14/23 09:34, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 11. 08. 23, 14:53, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> Don't allow overflowing multishot recv CQEs, it might get out of
>>> hand, hurt performanece, and in the worst case scenario OOM the task.
>>>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Fixes: b3fdea6ecb55c ("io_uring: multishot recv")
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> io_uring/net.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
>>> index 1599493544a5..8c419c01a5db 100644
>>> --- a/io_uring/net.c
>>> +++ b/io_uring/net.c
>>> @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static inline bool io_recv_finish(struct io_kiocb *req, int *ret,
>>> if (!mshot_finished) {
>>> if (io_aux_cqe(req, issue_flags & IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER,
>>> - *ret, cflags | IORING_CQE_F_MORE, true)) {
>>> + *ret, cflags | IORING_CQE_F_MORE, false)) {
>>
>> This one breaks iouring's recv-multishot.t test:
>> Running test recv-multishot.t MORE flag not set
>> test stream=0 wait_each=0 recvmsg=0 early_error=4 defer=0 failed
>> Test recv-multishot.t failed with ret 1
>>
>> Is the commit or the test broken ;)?
>
> The test is not right. I fixed it up while sending the kernel patch,
> but a new liburing version hasn't been cut yet and I assume you're
> not using upstream version?
I'll probably cut a new release soonish, we're after the merge window
now so whatever went into 6.6-rc should be solid/sane API wise.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-11 12:53 [PATCH 0/7] random fixes and cleanups Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot accept Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] io_uring/net: don't overflow multishot recv Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-14 8:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2023-09-14 13:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-14 14:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] io_uring: open code io_fill_cqe_req() Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] io_uring: remove return from io_req_cqe_overflow() Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] io_uring: never overflow io_aux_cqe Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] io_uring/rsrc: keep one global dummy_ubuf Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] io_uring: simplify io_run_task_work_sig return Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-11 16:43 ` [PATCH 0/7] random fixes and cleanups Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox