public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, csander@purestorage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing v2 2/4] test/bind-listen.t: Use ephemeral port
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:49:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b774faf6-d6e2-4828-8b1e-2ae440cb1cf7@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sedsh2vh.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>

On 12/2/25 4:37 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
> 
>> On 11/25/25 2:27 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>>> This test fails if port 8000 is already in use by something else.  Now
>>> that we have getsockname with direct file descriptors, use an ephemeral
>>> port instead.
>>
>> How is this going to work on older kernels? Probably retain the old
>> behavior, even if kind of shitty, on old kernels. Otherwise anything
>> pre 6.19 will now not run the bind-listen test at all.
> 
> Do you have a suggestion on how to check getsockname without doing the
> whole socket setup just to probe, considering this is a uring_cmd?
> Perhaps checking a feature that was merged at the same time?

I think just retain the old code - do the getsockname via io_uring, and
if it fails, then fall back to the old code. Then it'll both exercise
the new code, when available, yet still work on older kernels still.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-03  2:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-25 21:27 [PATCH liburing v2 0/4] liburing: getsockname support Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-11-25 21:27 ` [PATCH liburing v2 1/4] liburing: Introduce getsockname operation Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-11-25 21:27 ` [PATCH liburing v2 2/4] test/bind-listen.t: Use ephemeral port Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-11-26 20:49   ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-02 23:37     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-12-03  2:49       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-11-25 21:27 ` [PATCH liburing v2 3/4] bind-listen.t: Add tests for getsockname Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-11-26 20:58   ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-25 21:27 ` [PATCH liburing v2 4/4] man/io_uring_prep_getsockname.3: Add man page Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-11-26 20:54   ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-02 15:16 ` [PATCH liburing v2 0/4] liburing: getsockname support Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-20 22:13 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-11-20 22:13 ` [PATCH liburing v2 2/4] test/bind-listen.t: Use ephemeral port Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b774faf6-d6e2-4828-8b1e-2ae440cb1cf7@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox