From: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/14] fs: Add aop_flags parameter to create_page_buffers()
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:35:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/16/22 10:34 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:30:33AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>> On 2/14/22 10:14 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:43:56AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>>>> This adds the aop_flags parameter to the create_page_buffers function.
>>>> When AOP_FLAGS_NOWAIT parameter is set, the atomic allocation flag is
>>>> set. The AOP_FLAGS_NOWAIT flag is set, when async buffered writes are
>>>> enabled.
>>>
>>> Why is this better than passing in gfp flags directly?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think that gfp flags are a great fit here. We only want to pass in
>> a nowait flag and this does not map nicely to a gfp flag.
>
> ... what? The only thing you do with this flag is use it to choose
> some gfp flags. Pass those gfp flags in directly.
>
>>>> + gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (aop_flags & AOP_FLAGS_NOWAIT) {
>>>> + gfp |= GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN;
>>>> + gfp &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
>>>> + }
>
> The flags you've chosen here are also bonkers, but I'm not sure that
> it's worth explaining to you why if you're this resistant to making
> obvious corrections to your patches.
Sorry my comment was for patch 1 not patch 7.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 17:43 [PATCH v1 00/14] Support sync buffered writes for io-uring Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] fs: Add flags parameter to __block_write_begin_int Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 19:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-16 18:31 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-02-16 18:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] mm: Introduce do_generic_perform_write Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] mm: add noio support in filemap_get_pages Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 18:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-16 18:27 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 19:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-16 18:26 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] mm: Add support for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 19:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] fs: split off __alloc_page_buffers function Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 22:46 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-14 23:27 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-15 2:40 ` [RFC PATCH] fs: __alloc_page_buffers() can be static kernel test robot
2022-02-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] fs: split off __alloc_page_buffers function kernel test robot
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] fs: split off __create_empty_buffers function Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] fs: Add aop_flags parameter to create_page_buffers() Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 18:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-16 18:30 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-02-16 18:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-16 18:35 ` Stefan Roesch [this message]
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 08/14] fs: add support for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] io_uring: " Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:43 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] io_uring: Add tracepoint for short writes Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:44 ` [PATCH v1 11/14] sched: add new fields to task_struct Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:44 ` [PATCH v1 12/14] mm: support write throttling for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:44 ` [PATCH v1 13/14] io_uring: " Stefan Roesch
2022-02-14 17:44 ` [PATCH v1 14/14] block: enable async buffered writes for block devices Stefan Roesch
2022-02-15 3:59 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] Support sync buffered writes for io-uring Hao Xu
2022-02-15 17:38 ` Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox