From: David Laight <[email protected]>
To: 'Breno Leitao' <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]"
<[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <[email protected]>,
Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <[email protected]>, Song Liu <[email protected]>,
Yonghong Song <[email protected]>,
John Fastabend <[email protected]>,
"KP Singh" <[email protected]>, Hao Luo <[email protected]>,
Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>,
"David S. Miller" <[email protected]>,
Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>,
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>, Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>,
"Alexander Mikhalitsyn" <[email protected]>,
Xin Long <[email protected]>,
"David Howells" <[email protected]>,
Jason Xing <[email protected]>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 04/10] net/socket: Break down __sys_getsockopt
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:36:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
From: Breno Leitao
> Sent: 04 September 2023 17:25
>
> Split __sys_getsockopt() into two functions by removing the core
> logic into a sub-function (do_sock_getsockopt()). This will avoid
> code duplication when doing the same operation in other callers, for
> instance.
Although a lot more work, I think (others may disagree) that
the internal getsockopt() functions should be changed to take
the length as a parameter and return the positive value
to write back.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-05 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-04 16:24 [PATCH v4 00/10] io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] bpf: Leverage sockptr_t in BPF getsockopt hook Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] bpf: Leverage sockptr_t in BPF setsockopt hook Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] net/socket: Break down __sys_setsockopt Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] net/socket: Break down __sys_getsockopt Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 9:36 ` David Laight [this message]
2023-09-05 10:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] io_uring/cmd: Pass compat mode in issue_flags Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] selftests/net: Extract uring helpers to be reusable Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] io_uring/cmd: return -EOPNOTSUPP if net is disabled Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 12:32 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-09-08 17:04 ` Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 12:24 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 12:24 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] selftests/bpf/sockopt: Add io_uring support Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 22:49 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands Jakub Kicinski
2023-09-08 16:55 ` Breno Leitao
2023-10-06 15:45 ` Breno Leitao
2023-10-09 10:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-10-09 13:28 ` Breno Leitao
2023-10-09 16:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox