From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] io_uring/bpf-ops: add bpf struct ops registration
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:14:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba105ce0c281f7f4ad5f06a795a0641fc83b84ac.1769470552.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1769470552.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Implement BPF struct ops registration. It's registered from the BPF
path, and can be removed by BPF as well as io_uring, which is why it's
protected by a global lock io_bpf_ctrl_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 5 ++
io_uring/bpf-ops.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
io_uring/bpf-ops.h | 8 ++++
io_uring/io_uring.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 9990df98790d..5dfe3608dbb9 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
#include <linux/llist.h>
#include <uapi/linux/io_uring.h>
+struct iou_loop_params;
+struct io_uring_bpf_ops;
+
enum {
/*
* A hint to not wake right away but delay until there are enough of
@@ -462,6 +465,8 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
DECLARE_HASHTABLE(napi_ht, 4);
#endif
+ struct io_uring_bpf_ops *bpf_ops;
+
/*
* Protection for resize vs mmap races - both the mmap and resize
* side will need to grab this lock, to prevent either side from
diff --git a/io_uring/bpf-ops.c b/io_uring/bpf-ops.c
index ad4e3dc889ba..26955ff06ecf 100644
--- a/io_uring/bpf-ops.c
+++ b/io_uring/bpf-ops.c
@@ -4,10 +4,12 @@
#include "io_uring.h"
#include "register.h"
+#include "loop.h"
#include "memmap.h"
#include "bpf-ops.h"
#include "loop.h"
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(io_bpf_ctrl_mutex);
static const struct btf_type *loop_params_type;
__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
@@ -141,16 +143,99 @@ static int bpf_io_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
const struct btf_member *member,
void *kdata, const void *udata)
{
+ u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
+ const struct io_uring_bpf_ops *uops = udata;
+ struct io_uring_bpf_ops *ops = kdata;
+
+ switch (moff) {
+ case offsetof(struct io_uring_bpf_ops, ring_fd):
+ ops->ring_fd = uops->ring_fd;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int io_install_bpf(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_uring_bpf_ops *ops)
+{
+ if (ctx->flags & (IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL | IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (ctx->bpf_ops)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ops->loop_step))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ops->priv = ctx;
+ ctx->bpf_ops = ops;
+ ctx->loop_step = ops->loop_step;
return 0;
}
static int bpf_io_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ struct io_uring_bpf_ops *ops = kdata;
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;
+ struct file *file;
+ int ret = -EBUSY;
+
+ file = io_uring_register_get_file(ops->ring_fd, false);
+ if (IS_ERR(file))
+ return PTR_ERR(file);
+ ctx = file->private_data;
+
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &io_bpf_ctrl_mutex) {
+ guard(mutex)(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ ret = io_install_bpf(ctx, ops);
+ }
+
+ fput(file);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void io_eject_bpf(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ struct io_uring_bpf_ops *ops = ctx->bpf_ops;
+
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!ops))
+ return;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ops->priv != ctx))
+ return;
+
+ ops->priv = NULL;
+ ctx->bpf_ops = NULL;
+ ctx->loop_step = NULL;
}
static void bpf_io_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
+ struct io_uring_bpf_ops *ops = kdata;
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;
+
+ guard(mutex)(&io_bpf_ctrl_mutex);
+ ctx = ops->priv;
+ if (ctx) {
+ guard(mutex)(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->bpf_ops != ops))
+ return;
+
+ io_eject_bpf(ctx);
+ }
+}
+
+void io_unregister_bpf_ops(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ /* check it first to avoid taking io_bpf_ctrl_mutex */
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &ctx->uring_lock) {
+ if (!ctx->bpf_ops)
+ return;
+ }
+
+ guard(mutex)(&io_bpf_ctrl_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ if (ctx->bpf_ops)
+ io_eject_bpf(ctx);
}
static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_ring_ops = {
diff --git a/io_uring/bpf-ops.h b/io_uring/bpf-ops.h
index b9e589ad519a..bf4d5b9bb8c9 100644
--- a/io_uring/bpf-ops.h
+++ b/io_uring/bpf-ops.h
@@ -17,4 +17,12 @@ struct io_uring_bpf_ops {
void *priv;
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_IO_URING_BPF
+void io_unregister_bpf_ops(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
+#else
+static inline void io_unregister_bpf_ops(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
#endif /* IOU_BPF_OPS_H */
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 09920e56c9c9..9d6eef7ccf22 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -2141,6 +2141,7 @@ static __cold void io_req_caches_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static __cold void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
+ io_unregister_bpf_ops(ctx);
io_sq_thread_finish(ctx);
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 10:14 [PATCH v4 0/6] BPF controlled io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-27 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] io_uring: introduce callback driven main loop Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-27 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] io_uring/bpf-ops: add basic bpf struct_ops boilerplate Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-27 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] io_uring/bpf-ops: add loop_step struct_ops callback Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-27 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] io_uring/bpf-ops: add kfunc helpers Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-27 10:14 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-01-27 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] selftests/io_uring: add a bpf io_uring selftest Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-27 17:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-27 18:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-27 18:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-27 19:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba105ce0c281f7f4ad5f06a795a0641fc83b84ac.1769470552.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox