From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/8] io_uring: refactor __io_cq_unlock_post_flush()
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:20:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <baa9b8d822f024e4ee01c40209dbbe38d9c8c11d.1680782017.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Separate ->task_complete path in __io_cq_unlock_post_flush().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 8a327a81beaf..0ea50c46f27f 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -627,21 +627,23 @@ static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
io_cqring_wake(ctx);
}
-static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+static void __io_cq_unlock_post_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
__releases(ctx->completion_lock)
{
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
- __io_cq_unlock(ctx);
- io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
- /*
- * As ->task_complete implies that the ring is single tasked, cq_wait
- * may only be waited on by the current in io_cqring_wait(), but since
- * it will re-check the wakeup conditions once we return we can safely
- * skip waking it up.
- */
- if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN))
+ if (ctx->task_complete) {
+ /*
+ * ->task_complete implies that only current might be waiting
+ * for CQEs, and obviously, we currently don't. No one is
+ * waiting, wakeups are futile, skip them.
+ */
+ io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
+ } else {
+ __io_cq_unlock(ctx);
+ io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
io_cqring_wake(ctx);
+ }
}
void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 13:20 [PATCH v2 0/8] optimise resheduling due to deferred tw Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] io_uring: move pinning out of io_req_local_work_add Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] io_uring: optimie local tw add ctx pinning Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] io_uring: refactor __io_cq_unlock_post_flush() Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 14:23 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] io_uring: add tw add flags Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] io_uring: inline llist_add() Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] io_uring: reduce scheduling due to tw Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-06 13:20 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-04-06 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] io_uring: optimise io_req_local_work_add Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-12 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] optimise resheduling due to deferred tw Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=baa9b8d822f024e4ee01c40209dbbe38d9c8c11d.1680782017.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox