public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: liburing 2.3 API/ABI breakage
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:43:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2xaz5HwrGcbKJK8@fedora>

On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 20:58 -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > 2. Going from size_t to unsigned int is ABI breakage. This is
> > mitigated
> >    on CPU architectures that share 32-bit/64-bit registers (i.e.
> > rax/eax
> >    on x86-64 and r0/x0/w0 on aarch64). There's no guarantee this
> > works
> >    on all architectures, especially when the calling convention
> > passes
> >    arguments on the stack.
> 
> Good news, I realized that io_uring_prep_getxattr() and friends are
> static inline functions. ABI breakage doesn't come into play because
> they are compiled into the application.

Additionally the inline code was doing the narrowing cast anyway, so
there was no narrowing issues.

I really should have put this explanation in the commit message though
- will remember for next time.

> 
> The const char * to char * API breakage issue still remains but
> there's
> a pretty good chance that real applications already pass in char *.

If an application was passing a const pointer, it is probably
preferrable to get a compilation error here - as this would otherwise
lead to bugs (since it is very much treated as non-const).



  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-10  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09 21:32 liburing 2.3 API/ABI breakage Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-10  1:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-10  9:43   ` Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-11-10 13:46     ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=baf1f51132d42319a6a845ba391b21731ef80d6a.camel@fb.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox