From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: liburing 2.3 API/ABI breakage
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:43:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2xaz5HwrGcbKJK8@fedora>
On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 20:58 -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > 2. Going from size_t to unsigned int is ABI breakage. This is
> > mitigated
> > on CPU architectures that share 32-bit/64-bit registers (i.e.
> > rax/eax
> > on x86-64 and r0/x0/w0 on aarch64). There's no guarantee this
> > works
> > on all architectures, especially when the calling convention
> > passes
> > arguments on the stack.
>
> Good news, I realized that io_uring_prep_getxattr() and friends are
> static inline functions. ABI breakage doesn't come into play because
> they are compiled into the application.
Additionally the inline code was doing the narrowing cast anyway, so
there was no narrowing issues.
I really should have put this explanation in the commit message though
- will remember for next time.
>
> The const char * to char * API breakage issue still remains but
> there's
> a pretty good chance that real applications already pass in char *.
If an application was passing a const pointer, it is probably
preferrable to get a compilation error here - as this would otherwise
lead to bugs (since it is very much treated as non-const).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 21:32 liburing 2.3 API/ABI breakage Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-10 1:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-10 9:43 ` Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-11-10 13:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=baf1f51132d42319a6a845ba391b21731ef80d6a.camel@fb.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox