From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: David Ahern <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
"David S . Miller" <[email protected]>,
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>,
Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>,
Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] implement io_uring notification (ubuf_info) stacking
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 01:08:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 4/13/24 18:17, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/12/24 6:55 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> io_uring allocates a ubuf_info per zerocopy send request, it's convenient
>> for the userspace but with how things are it means that every time the
>> TCP stack has to allocate a new skb instead of amending into a previous
>> one. Unless sends are big enough, there will be lots of small skbs
>> straining the stack and dipping performance.
>
> The ubuf_info forces TCP segmentation at less than MTU boundaries which
> kills performance with small message sizes as TCP is forced to send
> small packets. This is an interesting solution to allow the byte stream
> to flow yet maintain the segmentation boundaries for callbacks.
Thanks, I'll add your reviews if the patches survive in the
current form!
>> The patchset implements notification, i.e. an io_uring's ubuf_info
>> extension, stacking. It tries to link ubuf_info's into a list, and
>> the entire link will be put down together once all references are
>> gone.
>>
>> Testing with liburing/examples/send-zerocopy and another custom made
>> tool, with 4K bytes per send it improves performance ~6 times and
>> levels it with MSG_ZEROCOPY. Without the patchset it requires much
>> larger sends to utilise all potential.
>>
>> bytes | before | after (Kqps)
>> 100 | 283 | 936
>> 1200 | 195 | 1023
>> 4000 | 193 | 1386
>> 8000 | 154 | 1058
>>
>> Pavel Begunkov (6):
>> net: extend ubuf_info callback to ops structure
>> net: add callback for setting a ubuf_info to skb
>> io_uring/notif: refactor io_tx_ubuf_complete()
>> io_uring/notif: remove ctx var from io_notif_tw_complete
>> io_uring/notif: simplify io_notif_flush()
>> io_uring/notif: implement notification stacking
>>
>> drivers/net/tap.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++-
>> include/linux/skbuff.h | 21 ++++++----
>> io_uring/notif.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> io_uring/notif.h | 13 +++---
>> net/core/skbuff.c | 37 +++++++++++------
>> 7 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 12:55 [RFC 0/6] implement io_uring notification (ubuf_info) stacking Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-12 12:55 ` [RFC 1/6] net: extend ubuf_info callback to ops structure Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-13 17:17 ` David Ahern
2024-04-14 17:07 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-15 0:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-15 15:06 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-15 18:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-15 19:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-16 14:50 ` David Ahern
2024-04-16 15:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-12 12:55 ` [RFC 2/6] net: add callback for setting a ubuf_info to skb Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-13 17:18 ` David Ahern
2024-04-12 12:55 ` [RFC 3/6] io_uring/notif: refactor io_tx_ubuf_complete() Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-12 12:55 ` [RFC 4/6] io_uring/notif: remove ctx var from io_notif_tw_complete Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-12 12:55 ` [RFC 5/6] io_uring/notif: simplify io_notif_flush() Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-12 12:55 ` [RFC 6/6] io_uring/notif: implement notification stacking Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-14 17:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-14 23:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-15 15:15 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-15 18:51 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-15 19:02 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-12 13:44 ` [RFC 0/6] implement io_uring notification (ubuf_info) stacking Jens Axboe
2024-04-12 14:52 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-13 17:17 ` David Ahern
2024-04-15 0:08 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox