From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add IORING_OP_NOP_FAIL
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 08:02:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zjw9jIHtan4FAc9D@fedora>
On 5/8/24 9:05 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:55:09PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/8/24 8:34 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> Add IORING_OP_NOP_FAIL so that it is easy to inject failure from
>>> userspace.
>>>
>>> Like IORING_OP_NOP, the main use case is test, and it is very helpful
>>> for covering failure handling code in io_uring core change.
>>
>> Rather than use a new opcode for this, why don't we just add it to
>> the existing NOP? I know we don't check for flags in currently, so
>> you would not know if it worked, but we could add that and just
>> backport that one-liner as well.
>
> Yeah, it is just for avoiding to break existed tests which may not build
> over liburing.
Don't think that's a huge risk, if someone is using the raw interface
and just not clearing, they would run into issues with mixed command
usage anyway. And a pure nop test would be fine anyway, as everything
starts out cleared.
> I will switch to this way, looks one-line backporting can solve it.
Exactly, thanks!
>> And if we had such a flag, the fail res could be passed in as well.
>
> We can just pass the 'injected_fail_res' via sqe->len, meantime keep
> 'nop_flags' for error injection and future extension.
Precisely.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-09 2:34 [PATCH] io_uring: add IORING_OP_NOP_FAIL Ming Lei
2024-05-09 2:55 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-09 3:05 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-09 4:03 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-09 14:02 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox