From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/poll: use IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE for wakeups
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:14:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
In the spirit of getting some closure/progress on this, how about this
for starters? Disables lazy wake for poll_exclusive, and provides a flag
that can otherwise be set to disable it as well.
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index d3009d56af0b..03401c6ce5bb 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ enum {
/* keep async read/write and isreg together and in order */
REQ_F_SUPPORT_NOWAIT_BIT,
REQ_F_ISREG_BIT,
+ REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY_BIT,
/* not a real bit, just to check we're not overflowing the space */
__REQ_F_LAST_BIT,
@@ -498,6 +499,8 @@ enum {
REQ_F_CLEAR_POLLIN = BIT(REQ_F_CLEAR_POLLIN_BIT),
/* hashed into ->cancel_hash_locked, protected by ->uring_lock */
REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED = BIT(REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED_BIT),
+ /* don't use lazy poll wake for this request */
+ REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY = BIT(REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY_BIT),
};
typedef void (*io_req_tw_func_t)(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts);
diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
index d38d05edb4fa..4fed5514c379 100644
--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -366,11 +366,16 @@ void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts)
static void __io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int mask)
{
+ unsigned flags = 0;
+
io_req_set_res(req, mask, 0);
req->io_task_work.func = io_poll_task_func;
trace_io_uring_task_add(req, mask);
- __io_req_task_work_add(req, IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE);
+
+ if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY))
+ flags = IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE;
+ __io_req_task_work_add(req, flags);
}
static inline void io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int res)
@@ -526,10 +531,17 @@ static void __io_queue_proc(struct io_poll *poll, struct io_poll_table *pt,
poll->head = head;
poll->wait.private = (void *) wqe_private;
- if (poll->events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)
+ if (poll->events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE) {
+ /*
+ * Exclusive waits may only wake a limited amount of entries
+ * rather than all of them, this may interfere with lazy
+ * wake if someone does wait(events > 1).
+ */
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY;
add_wait_queue_exclusive(head, &poll->wait);
- else
+ } else {
add_wait_queue(head, &poll->wait);
+ }
}
static void io_poll_queue_proc(struct file *file, struct wait_queue_head *head,
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-08 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 13:01 [PATCH] io_uring/poll: use IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE for wakeups Jens Axboe
2023-11-07 17:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-11-07 19:57 ` Jens Axboe
2023-11-08 16:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-11-09 13:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox