From: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: For 5.20 or 5.19? net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd()
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:09:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Hi Jens,
I'm wondering what happened to you patch passing file_ops->uring_cmd()
down to socket layers.
It was part of you work in progress branches...
The latest one I found was this:
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=nvme-passthru-wip.2&id=28b71b85831f5dd303acae12cfdc89e5aaae442b
And this one just having the generic parts were in a separate commit
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=io_uring-fops.v7&id=c2ba3bd8940ef0b7d1c09adf4bed01acc8171407
vs.
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=io_uring-fops.v7&id=542c38da58841097f97f710d1f05055c2f1039f0
I took this:
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=io_uring-fops.v7&id=c2ba3bd8940ef0b7d1c09adf4bed01acc8171407
adapted it on top of v5.19-rc4 and removed stuff that was not really needed.
Even if it's not used in tree, it would be good to have uring_cmd hooks in
struct proto_ops and struct proto, so that out of tree socket implementations
like my smbdirect driver are able to hook into it.
What do you think?
https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=commitdiff;h=7541d40a482a9f57d580ac05254c5a5982edff15
From 7541d40a482a9f57d580ac05254c5a5982edff15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:12:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd()
Pass it through the proto_ops->uring_cmd() handler, so we can plumb it
through all the way to the proto->uring_cmd() handler later
as required.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/net.h | 4 ++++
include/net/sock.h | 7 +++++++
net/core/sock.c | 12 ++++++++++++
net/socket.c | 13 +++++++++++++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
index 12093f4db50c..59d37aade979 100644
--- a/include/linux/net.h
+++ b/include/linux/net.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct pipe_inode_info;
struct inode;
struct file;
struct net;
+struct io_uring_cmd;
/* Historically, SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE & SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA were located
* in sock->flags, but moved into sk->sk_wq->flags to be RCU protected.
@@ -178,6 +179,9 @@ struct proto_ops {
int (*compat_ioctl) (struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg);
#endif
+ int (*uring_cmd)(struct socket *sock,
+ struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
+ unsigned issue_flags);
int (*gettstamp) (struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
bool timeval, bool time32);
int (*listen) (struct socket *sock, int len);
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 72ca97ccb460..80fd3f45cd09 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ typedef struct {
struct sock;
struct proto;
struct net;
+struct io_uring_cmd;
typedef __u32 __bitwise __portpair;
typedef __u64 __bitwise __addrpair;
@@ -1181,6 +1182,9 @@ struct proto {
int (*ioctl)(struct sock *sk, int cmd,
unsigned long arg);
+ int (*uring_cmd)(struct sock *sk,
+ struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
+ unsigned int issue_flags);
int (*init)(struct sock *sk);
void (*destroy)(struct sock *sk);
void (*shutdown)(struct sock *sk, int how);
@@ -1886,6 +1890,9 @@ int sock_common_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
int sock_common_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
+int sock_common_uring_cmd(struct socket *sock, struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
+ unsigned int issue_flags);
+
void sk_common_release(struct sock *sk);
/*
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 2ff40dd0a7a6..42b3def01a5f 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3582,6 +3582,18 @@ int sock_common_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_common_setsockopt);
+int sock_common_uring_cmd(struct socket *sock, struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
+ unsigned int issue_flags)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+
+ if (!sk->sk_prot->uring_cmd)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ return sk->sk_prot->uring_cmd(sk, ioucmd, issue_flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_common_uring_cmd);
+
void sk_common_release(struct sock *sk)
{
if (sk->sk_prot->destroy)
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 2bc8773d9dc5..67701c685921 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
#include <linux/xattr.h>
#include <linux/nospec.h>
#include <linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h>
+#include <linux/io_uring.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_poll __read_mostly;
static ssize_t sock_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to);
static ssize_t sock_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from);
static int sock_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+static int sock_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd, unsigned int issue_flags);
static int sock_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
static __poll_t sock_poll(struct file *file,
@@ -158,6 +160,7 @@ static const struct file_operations socket_file_ops = {
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
.compat_ioctl = compat_sock_ioctl,
#endif
+ .uring_cmd = sock_uring_cmd,
.mmap = sock_mmap,
.release = sock_close,
.fasync = sock_fasync,
@@ -1289,6 +1292,16 @@ static long sock_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
return err;
}
+static int sock_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
+{
+ struct socket *sock = ioucmd->file->private_data;
+
+ if (!sock->ops->uring_cmd)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ return sock->ops->uring_cmd(sock, ioucmd, issue_flags);
+}
+
/**
* sock_create_lite - creates a socket
* @family: protocol family (AF_INET, ...)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-28 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 19:09 Stefan Metzmacher [this message]
2022-06-28 19:26 ` For 5.20 or 5.19? net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd() Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox