From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>,
Jason Wang <[email protected]>, Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] block: add a rq_list type
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:38:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 11/15/24 5:49 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/14/24 1:11 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 04:20:44PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>> index 65f37ae70712..ce8b65503ff0 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>> @@ -1006,6 +1006,11 @@ extern void blk_put_queue(struct request_queue *);
>>> void blk_mark_disk_dead(struct gendisk *disk);
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
>>> +struct rq_list {
>>> + struct request *head;
>>> + struct request *tail;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * blk_plug permits building a queue of related requests by holding the I/O
>>> * fragments for a short period. This allows merging of sequential requests
>>> @@ -1018,10 +1023,10 @@ void blk_mark_disk_dead(struct gendisk *disk);
>>> * blk_flush_plug() is called.
>>> */
>>> struct blk_plug {
>>> - struct request *mq_list; /* blk-mq requests */
>>> + struct rq_list mq_list; /* blk-mq requests */
>>>
>>> /* if ios_left is > 1, we can batch tag/rq allocations */
>>> - struct request *cached_rq;
>>> + struct rq_list cached_rqs;
>>> u64 cur_ktime;
>>> unsigned short nr_ios;
>>>
>>> @@ -1683,7 +1688,7 @@ int bdev_thaw(struct block_device *bdev);
>>> void bdev_fput(struct file *bdev_file);
>>>
>>> struct io_comp_batch {
>>> - struct request *req_list;
>>> + struct rq_list req_list;
>>
>> This change as commit a3396b99990d ("block: add a rq_list type") in
>> next-20241114 causes errors when CONFIG_BLOCK is disabled because the
>> definition of 'struct rq_list' is under CONFIG_BLOCK. Should it be moved
>> out?
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> index 00212e96261a..a1fd0ddce5cf 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> @@ -1006,12 +1006,12 @@ extern void blk_put_queue(struct request_queue *);
>>
>> void blk_mark_disk_dead(struct gendisk *disk);
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
>> struct rq_list {
>> struct request *head;
>> struct request *tail;
>> };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
>> /*
>> * blk_plug permits building a queue of related requests by holding the I/O
>> * fragments for a short period. This allows merging of sequential requests
>>
>
> Fix looks fine, but I can't apply a patch that hasn't been signed off.
> Please send one, or I'll just have to sort it out manually as we're
> really close to this code shipping.
I fixed it up myself, it's too close to me sending out 6.13 changes
to let it linger:
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux/commit/?h=for-6.13/block&id=957860cbc1dc89f79f2acc193470224e350dfd03
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 15:20 don't reorder requests passed to ->queue_rqs Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-13 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] nvme-pci: reverse request order in nvme_queue_rqs Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-13 19:10 ` Keith Busch
2024-11-13 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] virtio_blk: reverse request order in virtio_queue_rqs Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-13 19:03 ` Keith Busch
2024-11-13 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-13 23:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-11-13 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: remove rq_list_move Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-13 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: add a rq_list type Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-14 20:11 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-11-15 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-15 12:49 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-15 19:38 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-11-16 0:56 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-11-13 15:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: don't reorder requests in blk_add_rq_to_plug Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-13 15:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: don't reorder requests in blk_mq_add_to_batch Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-13 18:33 ` don't reorder requests passed to ->queue_rqs Bart Van Assche
2024-11-13 18:39 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-13 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-13 20:36 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-11-13 20:51 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-13 22:23 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-11-13 22:27 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-14 4:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-14 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-18 15:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox