From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 01:59:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf17089a9bcf65375a70b527fce21f56620f8d1d.1609725418.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&new->fa_lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
lock(&new->fa_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Move kill_fasync() out of io_commit_cqring() to io_cqring_ev_posted(),
so it doesn't hold completion_lock while doing it. That saves from the
reported deadlock, and it's just nice to shorten the locking time and
untangle nested locks (compl_lock -> wq_head::lock).
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 2beb1e72302d..9c554adf3993 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1345,11 +1345,6 @@ static void __io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
/* order cqe stores with ring update */
smp_store_release(&rings->cq.tail, ctx->cached_cq_tail);
-
- if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
- wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
- kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
- }
}
static void io_put_identity(struct io_uring_task *tctx, struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -1713,6 +1708,10 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
+ wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
+ kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+ }
}
static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -1723,6 +1722,10 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
}
if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
+ wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
+ kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+ }
}
/* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 1:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] io_uring: drop file refs after task cancel Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] io_uring: cancel more aggressively in exit_work Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] io_uring: trigger eventfd for IOPOLL Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 1:59 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-01-04 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] io_uring: synchronise IOPOLL on task_submit fail Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] io_uring: patch up IOPOLL overflow_flush sync Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] bunch of random fixes Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf17089a9bcf65375a70b527fce21f56620f8d1d.1609725418.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox