From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] io_uring: fix IOPOLL with passthrough I/O
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:28:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c008dbd2-6436-40da-b5c6-f34844878a6f@kernel.dk> (raw)
A previous commit improving IOPOLL made an incorrect assumption that
task_work isn't used with IOPOLL. This can cause crashes when doing
passthrough I/O on nvme, where queueing the completion task_work will
trample on the same memory that holds the completed list of requests.
Fix it up by shuffling the members around, so we're not sharing any
parts that end up getting used in this path.
Fixes: 3c7d76d6128a ("io_uring: IOPOLL polling improvements")
Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/CAHj4cs_SLPj9v9w5MgfzHKy+983enPx3ZQY2kMuMJ1202DBefw@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
v2: ensure ->iopoll_start is read before doing actual polling
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index e4c804f99c30..211686ad89fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -713,13 +713,10 @@ struct io_kiocb {
atomic_t refs;
bool cancel_seq_set;
- /*
- * IOPOLL doesn't use task_work, so use the ->iopoll_node list
- * entry to manage pending iopoll requests.
- */
union {
struct io_task_work io_task_work;
- struct list_head iopoll_node;
+ /* For IOPOLL setup queues, with hybrid polling */
+ u64 iopoll_start;
};
union {
@@ -728,8 +725,8 @@ struct io_kiocb {
* poll
*/
struct hlist_node hash_node;
- /* For IOPOLL setup queues, with hybrid polling */
- u64 iopoll_start;
+ /* IOPOLL completion handling */
+ struct list_head iopoll_node;
/* for private io_kiocb freeing */
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
};
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 307f1f39d9f3..c33c533a267e 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -1296,12 +1296,13 @@ static int io_uring_hybrid_poll(struct io_kiocb *req,
struct io_comp_batch *iob, unsigned int poll_flags)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- u64 runtime, sleep_time;
+ u64 runtime, sleep_time, iopoll_start;
int ret;
+ iopoll_start = READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_start);
sleep_time = io_hybrid_iopoll_delay(ctx, req);
ret = io_uring_classic_poll(req, iob, poll_flags);
- runtime = ktime_get_ns() - req->iopoll_start - sleep_time;
+ runtime = ktime_get_ns() - iopoll_start - sleep_time;
/*
* Use minimum sleep time if we're polling devices with different
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 15:28 Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-01-14 22:08 ` [PATCH v2] io_uring: fix IOPOLL with passthrough I/O Yi Zhang
2026-01-15 1:42 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c008dbd2-6436-40da-b5c6-f34844878a6f@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox