From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] io_uring/msg_ring: avoid double indirection task_work for data messages
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 08:23:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/28/24 7:32 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 5/24/24 23:58, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> If IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER is set, then we can't post CQEs remotely
>> to the target ring. Instead, task_work is queued for the target ring,
>> which is used to post the CQE. To make matters worse, once the target
>> CQE has been posted, task_work is then queued with the originator to
>> fill the completion.
>>
>> This obviously adds a bunch of overhead and latency. Instead of relying
>> on generic kernel task_work for this, fill an overflow entry on the
>> target ring and flag it as such that the target ring will flush it. This
>> avoids both the task_work for posting the CQE, and it means that the
>> originator CQE can be filled inline as well.
>>
>> In local testing, this reduces the latency on the sender side by 5-6x.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> io_uring/msg_ring.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/io_uring/msg_ring.c b/io_uring/msg_ring.c
>> index feff2b0822cf..3f89ff3a40ad 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/msg_ring.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/msg_ring.c
>> @@ -123,6 +123,69 @@ static void io_msg_tw_complete(struct callback_head *head)
>> io_req_queue_tw_complete(req, ret);
>> }
>> +static struct io_overflow_cqe *io_alloc_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *target_ctx)
>> +{
>> + bool is_cqe32 = target_ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32;
>> + size_t cqe_size = sizeof(struct io_overflow_cqe);
>> + struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
>> +
>> + if (is_cqe32)
>> + cqe_size += sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe);
>> +
>> + ocqe = kmalloc(cqe_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>
> __GFP_ACCOUNT looks painful
It always is - I did add the usual alloc cache for this after posting
this series, which makes it a no-op basically:
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux/commit/?h=io_uring-msg_ring&id=c39ead262b60872d6d7daf55e9fc7d76dc09b29d
Just haven't posted a v2 yet.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-24 22:58 [PATCHSET 0/3] Improve MSG_RING SINGLE_ISSUER performance Jens Axboe
2024-05-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring/msg_ring: split fd installing into a helper Jens Axboe
2024-05-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring/msg_ring: avoid double indirection task_work for data messages Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 13:18 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-28 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 13:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-28 14:23 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-05-28 16:23 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-28 17:59 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-29 2:04 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-29 2:43 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-24 22:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring/msg_ring: avoid double indirection task_work for fd passing Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 13:31 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] Improve MSG_RING SINGLE_ISSUER performance Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-28 14:34 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 15:27 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 16:50 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-28 18:07 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-28 23:04 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-29 1:35 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-29 2:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-29 2:42 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox