public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: John David Anglin <[email protected]>,
	linux-parisc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: io_uring failure on parisc (32-bit userspace and 64-bit kernel)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 14:28:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 2/12/23 14:16, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/12/23 2:47?AM, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We see io-uring failures on the parisc architecture with this testcase:
>> https://github.com/axboe/liburing/blob/master/examples/io_uring-test.c
>>
>> parisc is always big-endian 32-bit userspace, with either 32- or 64-bit kernel.
>>
>> On a 64-bit kernel (6.1.11):
>> deller@parisc:~$ ./io_uring-test test.file
>> ret=0, wanted 4096
>> Submitted=4, completed=1, bytes=0
>> -> failure
>>
>> strace shows:
>> io_uring_setup(4, {flags=0, sq_thread_cpu=0, sq_thread_idle=0, sq_entries=4, cq_entries=8, features=IORING_FEAT_SINGLE_MMAP|IORING_FEAT_NODROP|IORING_FEAT_SUBMIT_STABLE|IORING_FEAT_RW_CUR_POS|IORING_FEAT_CUR_PERSONALITY|IORING_FEAT_FAST_POLL|IORING_FEAT_POLL_32BITS|0x1f80, sq_off={head=0, tail=16, ring_mask=64, ring_entries=72, flags=84, dropped=80, array=224}, cq_off={head=32, tail=48, ring_mask=68, ring_entries=76, overflow=92, cqes=96, flags=0x58 /* IORING_CQ_??? */}}) = 3
>> mmap2(NULL, 240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_POPULATE, 3, 0) = 0xf7522000
>> mmap2(NULL, 256, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_POPULATE, 3, 0x10000000) = 0xf6922000
>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "libell0-dbgsym_0.56-2_hppa.deb", O_RDONLY|O_DIRECT) = 4
>> statx(4, "", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT|AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_BASIC_STATS, {stx_mask=STATX_BASIC_STATS|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0644, stx_size=689308, ...}) = 0
>> getrandom("\x5c\xcf\x38\x2d", 4, GRND_NONBLOCK) = 4
>> brk(NULL)                               = 0x4ae000
>> brk(0x4cf000)                           = 0x4cf000
>> io_uring_enter(3, 4, 0, 0, NULL, 8)     = 0
>>
>>
>> Running the same testcase on a 32-bit kernel (6.1.11) works:
>> root@debian:~# ./io_uring-test test.file
>> Submitted=4, completed=4, bytes=16384
>> -> ok.
>>
>> strace:
>> io_uring_setup(4, {flags=0, sq_thread_cpu=0, sq_thread_idle=0, sq_entries=4, cq_entries=8, features=IORING_FEAT_SINGLE_MMAP|IORING_FEAT_NODROP|IORING_FEAT_SUBMIT_STABLE|IORING_FEAT_RW_CUR_POS|IORING_FEAT_CUR_PERSONALITY|IORING_FEAT_FAST_POLL|IORING_FEAT_POLL_32BITS|0x1f80, sq_off={head=0, tail=16, ring_mask=64, ring_entries=72, flags=84, dropped=80, array=224}, cq_off={head=32, tail=48, ring_mask=68, ring_entries=76, overflow=92, cqes=96, flags=0x58 /* IORING_CQ_??? */}}) = 3
>> mmap2(NULL, 240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_POPULATE, 3, 0) = 0xf6d4c000
>> mmap2(NULL, 256, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_POPULATE, 3, 0x10000000) = 0xf694c000
>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "trace.dat", O_RDONLY|O_DIRECT) = 4
>> statx(4, "", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT|AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_BASIC_STATS, {stx_mask=STATX_BASIC_STATS|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0644, stx_size=1855488, ...}) = 0
>> getrandom("\xb2\x3f\x0c\x65", 4, GRND_NONBLOCK) = 4
>> brk(NULL)                               = 0x15000
>> brk(0x36000)                            = 0x36000
>> io_uring_enter(3, 4, 0, 0, NULL, 8)     = 4
>>
>> I'm happy to test any patch if someone has an idea....
>
> No idea what this could be, to be honest. I tried your qemu vm image,
> and it does boot, but it's missing keys to be able to update apt and
> install packages... After fiddling with this for 30 min I gave up, any
> chance you can update the sid image? Given how slow this thing is
> running, it'd take me all day to do a fresh install and I have to admit
> I'm not THAT motivated about parisc to do that :)

Yes, I will update that image, but qemu currently only supports a 32-bit PA-RISC
CPU which can only run the 32-bit kernel. So even if I update it, you won't be
able to reproduce it, as it only happens with the 64-bit kernel.
I'm sure it's some kind of missing 32-to-64bit translation in the kernel, which
triggers only big-endian machines.

Does powerpc with a 64-bit ppc64 kernel work?
I'd assume it will show the same issue.

I will try to add some printks and compare the output of 32- and 64-bit kernels.
If you have some suggestion where to add such (which?) debug code, it would help me a lot.

Thank you,
Helge

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-12 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-12  9:47 io_uring failure on parisc (32-bit userspace and 64-bit kernel) Helge Deller
2023-02-12 13:16 ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-12 13:28   ` Helge Deller [this message]
2023-02-12 13:35     ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-12 14:00       ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-12 14:03       ` Helge Deller
2023-02-12 19:35         ` Helge Deller
2023-02-12 19:42           ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-12 20:01             ` Helge Deller
2023-02-12 21:48               ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-12 22:20                 ` Helge Deller
2023-02-12 22:31                   ` Helge Deller
2023-02-13 16:15                     ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-13 20:59                       ` Helge Deller
2023-02-13 21:05                         ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-13 22:05                           ` Helge Deller
2023-02-13 22:50                             ` John David Anglin
2023-02-14 23:09                               ` io_uring failure on parisc with VIPT caches Helge Deller
2023-02-14 23:29                                 ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15  2:12                                   ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 15:16                                     ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 15:52                                       ` Helge Deller
2023-02-15 15:56                                         ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 16:02                                           ` Helge Deller
2023-02-15 16:04                                             ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 21:40                                               ` Helge Deller
2023-02-15 23:04                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 16:38                                           ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 17:01                                             ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 19:00                                               ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 19:16                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 20:27                                                   ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 20:37                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 21:06                                                       ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 21:38                                                         ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 21:39                                                         ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 22:10                                                           ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 23:02                                                             ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 23:43                                                               ` John David Anglin
2023-02-16  2:40                                                               ` John David Anglin
2023-02-16  2:50                                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-16  8:24                                                                   ` Helge Deller
2023-02-16 15:22                                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-16 20:35                                                                     ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 23:03                                                           ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 19:20                                                 ` John David Anglin
2023-02-15 19:24                                                   ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-15 16:18                                         ` John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox