From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH for-next 2/6] io_uring: don't inline __io_get_cqe()
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:48:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1ac829198a881b7af8710926f99a3559b9f24c0.1655455613.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
__io_get_cqe() is not as hot as io_get_cqe(), no need to inline it, it
sheds ~500B from the binary.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
io_uring/io_uring.h | 36 +-----------------------------------
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 7ffb8422e7d0..a3b1339335c5 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static inline void io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
__io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
}
+static inline unsigned int __io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ return ctx->cached_cq_tail - READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.head);
+}
+
static bool io_match_linked(struct io_kiocb *head)
{
struct io_kiocb *req;
@@ -673,6 +678,36 @@ bool io_cqring_event_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res,
return true;
}
+/*
+ * writes to the cq entry need to come after reading head; the
+ * control dependency is enough as we're using WRITE_ONCE to
+ * fill the cq entry
+ */
+struct io_uring_cqe *__io_get_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings;
+ unsigned int off = ctx->cached_cq_tail & (ctx->cq_entries - 1);
+ unsigned int shift = 0;
+ unsigned int free, queued, len;
+
+ if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32)
+ shift = 1;
+
+ /* userspace may cheat modifying the tail, be safe and do min */
+ queued = min(__io_cqring_events(ctx), ctx->cq_entries);
+ free = ctx->cq_entries - queued;
+ /* we need a contiguous range, limit based on the current array offset */
+ len = min(free, ctx->cq_entries - off);
+ if (!len)
+ return NULL;
+
+ ctx->cached_cq_tail++;
+ ctx->cqe_cached = &rings->cqes[off];
+ ctx->cqe_sentinel = ctx->cqe_cached + len;
+ ctx->cqe_cached++;
+ return &rings->cqes[off << shift];
+}
+
static bool io_fill_cqe_aux(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags)
{
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index ce6538c9aed3..51032a494aec 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -16,44 +16,10 @@ enum {
IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE = -EIOCBQUEUED,
};
+struct io_uring_cqe *__io_get_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
bool io_cqring_event_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res,
u32 cflags, u64 extra1, u64 extra2);
-static inline unsigned int __io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-{
- return ctx->cached_cq_tail - READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.head);
-}
-
-/*
- * writes to the cq entry need to come after reading head; the
- * control dependency is enough as we're using WRITE_ONCE to
- * fill the cq entry
- */
-static inline struct io_uring_cqe *__io_get_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-{
- struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings;
- unsigned int off = ctx->cached_cq_tail & (ctx->cq_entries - 1);
- unsigned int shift = 0;
- unsigned int free, queued, len;
-
- if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32)
- shift = 1;
-
- /* userspace may cheat modifying the tail, be safe and do min */
- queued = min(__io_cqring_events(ctx), ctx->cq_entries);
- free = ctx->cq_entries - queued;
- /* we need a contiguous range, limit based on the current array offset */
- len = min(free, ctx->cq_entries - off);
- if (!len)
- return NULL;
-
- ctx->cached_cq_tail++;
- ctx->cqe_cached = &rings->cqes[off];
- ctx->cqe_sentinel = ctx->cqe_cached + len;
- ctx->cqe_cached++;
- return &rings->cqes[off << shift];
-}
-
static inline struct io_uring_cqe *io_get_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
if (likely(ctx->cqe_cached < ctx->cqe_sentinel)) {
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-17 8:47 [PATCH for-next 0/6] clean up __io_fill_cqe_req() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-17 8:48 ` [PATCH for-next 1/6] io_uring: don't expose io_fill_cqe_aux() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-17 8:48 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-06-17 8:48 ` [PATCH for-next 3/6] io_uring: introduce io_req_cqe_overflow() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-17 8:48 ` [PATCH for-next 4/6] io_uring: deduplicate __io_fill_cqe_req tracing Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-17 8:48 ` [PATCH for-next 5/6] io_uring: deduplicate io_get_cqe() calls Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-17 8:48 ` [PATCH for-next 6/6] io_uring: change ->cqe_cached invariant for CQE32 Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-17 13:35 ` [PATCH for-next 0/6] clean up __io_fill_cqe_req() Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1ac829198a881b7af8710926f99a3559b9f24c0.1655455613.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox