Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce getsockname io_uring_cmd

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 10/24/25 9:48 AM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> 
> This feature has been requested a few times in the liburing repository
> and Discord channels, such as in [1,2].  If anything, it also helps
> solve a long standing issue in the bind-listen test that results in
> occasional test failures.
> 
> The patchset is divided in three parts: Patch 1 merges the getpeername
> and getsockname implementation in the network layer, making further
> patches easier; Patch 2 splits out a helper used by io_uring, like done
> for other network commands; Finally, patch 3 plumbs the new command in
> io_uring.
> 
> The syscall path was tested by booting a Linux distro, which does all
> sorts of getsockname/getpeername syscalls.  The io_uring side was tested
> with a couple of new liburing subtests available at:
> 
>    https://github.com/krisman/liburing.git -b socket
> 
> Based on top of Jens' for-next.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/1356
> [2] https://discord.com/channels/1241076672589991966/1241076672589991970/1429975797912830074

Looks good to me, and it's not often you can add a new feature and
have:

>  5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

a net zero diffstat! Nice.

-- 
Jens Axboe