From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] io_uring: don't resched with empty task_list
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:14:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4173e288e69793d03c7d7ce826f9d28afba718a.1623949695.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Entering tctx_task_work() with empty task_list is a strange scenario,
that can happen only on rare occasion during task exit, so let's not
check for task_list emptiness in advance and do it do-while style. The
code still correct for the empty case, just would do extra work about
which we don't care.
Do extra step and do the check before cond_resched(), so we don't
resched if have nothing to execute.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 31afe25596d7..2fdca298e173 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
clear_bit(0, &tctx->task_state);
- while (!wq_list_empty(&tctx->task_list)) {
+ while (1) {
struct io_wq_work_node *node;
spin_lock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
@@ -1917,6 +1917,8 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
req->task_work.func(&req->task_work);
node = next;
}
+ if (wq_list_empty(&tctx->task_list))
+ break;
cond_resched();
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 17:13 [PATCH for-next 00/12] another round of 5.14 optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/12] io_uring: fix false WARN_ONCE Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 02/12] io_uring: refactor io_submit_flush_completions() Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 03/12] io_uring: move creds from io-wq work to io_kiocb Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 04/12] io_uring: track request creds with a flag Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 05/12] io_uring: simplify iovec freeing in io_clean_op() Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 06/12] io_uring: clean all flags in io_clean_op() at once Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 07/12] io_uring: refactor io_get_sequence() Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 08/12] io_uring: inline __tctx_task_work() Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 09/12] io_uring: optimise task_work submit flushing Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 10/12] io_uring: refactor tctx task_work list splicing Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-17 17:14 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-06-17 17:14 ` [PATCH 12/12] io_uring: improve in tctx_task_work() resubmission Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-18 15:23 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-18 15:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-18 15:35 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4173e288e69793d03c7d7ce826f9d28afba718a.1623949695.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox