From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] io_uring: use slist for completion batching
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 14:57:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a666826f2854d17e9fb9417fb302edfeb750f425.1632516769.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
在 2021/9/25 上午4:59, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
> Currently we collect requests for completion batching in an array.
> Replace them with a singly linked list. It's as fast as arrays but
> doesn't take some much space in ctx, and will be used in future patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 9c14e9e722ba..9a76c4f84311 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ struct io_submit_state {
> /*
> * Batch completion logic
> */
> - struct io_kiocb *compl_reqs[IO_COMPL_BATCH];
> - unsigned int compl_nr;
> + struct io_wq_work_list compl_reqs;
Will it be better to rename struct io_wq_work_list to something more
generic, io_wq_work_list is a bit confused, we are now using this
type of linked list (stack as well) for various aim, not just to link
iowq works.
> +
> /* inline/task_work completion list, under ->uring_lock */
> struct list_head free_list;
> };
> @@ -883,6 +883,8 @@ struct io_kiocb {
> struct io_wq_work work;
> const struct cred *creds;
>
> + struct io_wq_work_node comp_list;
> +
> /* store used ubuf, so we can prevent reloading */
> struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
> };
> @@ -1169,7 +1171,7 @@ static inline void req_ref_get(struct io_kiocb *req)
>
> static inline void io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - if (ctx->submit_state.compl_nr)
> + if (!wq_list_empty(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs))
> __io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
> }
>
> @@ -1326,6 +1328,7 @@ static struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->submit_state.free_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->locked_free_list);
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ctx->fallback_work, io_fallback_req_func);
> + INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs);
> return ctx;
> err:
> kfree(ctx->dummy_ubuf);
> @@ -1831,11 +1834,16 @@ static inline bool io_req_needs_clean(struct io_kiocb *req)
> static void io_req_complete_state(struct io_kiocb *req, long res,
> unsigned int cflags)
> {
> + struct io_submit_state *state;
> +
> if (io_req_needs_clean(req))
> io_clean_op(req);
> req->result = res;
> req->compl.cflags = cflags;
> req->flags |= REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE;
> +
> + state = &req->ctx->submit_state;
> + wq_list_add_tail(&req->comp_list, &state->compl_reqs);
> }
>
> static inline void __io_req_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags,
> @@ -2324,13 +2332,14 @@ static void io_req_free_batch(struct req_batch *rb, struct io_kiocb *req,
> static void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> __must_hold(&ctx->uring_lock)
> {
> + struct io_wq_work_node *node, *prev;
> struct io_submit_state *state = &ctx->submit_state;
> - int i, nr = state->compl_nr;
> struct req_batch rb;
>
> spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
> - for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> - struct io_kiocb *req = state->compl_reqs[i];
> + wq_list_for_each(node, prev, &state->compl_reqs) {
> + struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
> + comp_list);
>
> __io_cqring_fill_event(ctx, req->user_data, req->result,
> req->compl.cflags);
> @@ -2340,15 +2349,18 @@ static void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
>
> io_init_req_batch(&rb);
> - for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> - struct io_kiocb *req = state->compl_reqs[i];
> + node = state->compl_reqs.first;
> + do {
> + struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
> + comp_list);
>
> + node = req->comp_list.next;
> if (req_ref_put_and_test(req))
> io_req_free_batch(&rb, req, &ctx->submit_state);
> - }
> + } while (node);
>
> io_req_free_batch_finish(ctx, &rb);
> - state->compl_nr = 0;
> + INIT_WQ_LIST(&state->compl_reqs);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2668,17 +2680,10 @@ static void io_req_task_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
> unsigned int cflags = io_put_rw_kbuf(req);
> long res = req->result;
>
> - if (*locked) {
> - struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
> - struct io_submit_state *state = &ctx->submit_state;
> -
> + if (*locked)
> io_req_complete_state(req, res, cflags);
> - state->compl_reqs[state->compl_nr++] = req;
> - if (state->compl_nr == ARRAY_SIZE(state->compl_reqs))
> - io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
> - } else {
> + else
> io_req_complete_post(req, res, cflags);
> - }
> }
>
> static void __io_complete_rw(struct io_kiocb *req, long res, long res2,
> @@ -6969,15 +6974,8 @@ static void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req)
> * doesn't support non-blocking read/write attempts
> */
> if (likely(!ret)) {
> - if (req->flags & REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE) {
> - struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
> - struct io_submit_state *state = &ctx->submit_state;
> -
> - state->compl_reqs[state->compl_nr++] = req;
> - if (state->compl_nr == ARRAY_SIZE(state->compl_reqs))
> - io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
> + if (req->flags & REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE)
> return;
> - }
>
> linked_timeout = io_prep_linked_timeout(req);
> if (linked_timeout)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-26 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-24 20:59 [PATCH v2 00/24] rework and optimise submission+completion paths Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] io_uring: mark having different creds unlikely Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] io_uring: force_nonspin Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] io_uring: make io_do_iopoll return number of reqs Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] io_uring: use slist for completion batching Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-26 6:57 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-09-28 9:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-28 15:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] io_uring: remove allocation cache array Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] io-wq: add io_wq_work_node based stack Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] io_uring: replace list with stack for req caches Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] io_uring: split iopoll loop Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] io_uring: use single linked list for iopoll Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] io_uring: add a helper for batch free Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-26 3:36 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-28 9:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] io_uring: convert iopoll_completed to store_release Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] io_uring: optimise batch completion Pavel Begunkov
[not found] ` <CAFUsyfLSXMvd_MBAp83qriW7LD=bg2=25TC4e_X4oMO1atoPYg@mail.gmail.com>
2021-09-28 9:35 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] io_uring: inline completion batching helpers Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] io_uring: don't pass tail into io_free_batch_list Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] io_uring: don't pass state to io_submit_state_end Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] io_uring: deduplicate io_queue_sqe() call sites Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] io_uring: remove drain_active check from hot path Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] io_uring: split slow path from io_queue_sqe Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] io_uring: inline hot path of __io_queue_sqe() Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] io_uring: reshuffle queue_sqe completion handling Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] io_uring: restructure submit sqes to_submit checks Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] io_uring: kill off ->inflight_entry field Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] io_uring: comment why inline complete calls io_clean_op() Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] io_uring: disable draining earlier Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-30 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] rework and optimise submission+completion paths Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4b3163b-fc75-059e-1cc9-2b5ed9ce93a3@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox