From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 06/16] io_uring: reorder cqring_flush and wakeups
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:31:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6e71a25b020c8dcf554d30ac556378e0d6e318b.1692119257.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Unlike in the past, io_commit_cqring_flush() doesn't do anything that
may need io_cqring_wake() to be issued after, all requests it completes
will go via task_work. Do io_commit_cqring_flush() after
io_cqring_wake() to clean up __io_cq_unlock_post().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 14 +++-----------
io_uring/rw.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index e5378dc7aa19..8d27d2a2e893 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -629,19 +629,11 @@ static inline void io_cq_lock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
-
- if (ctx->task_complete) {
- /*
- * ->task_complete implies that only current might be waiting
- * for CQEs, and obviously, we currently don't. No one is
- * waiting, wakeups are futile, skip them.
- */
- io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
- } else {
+ if (!ctx->task_complete) {
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
- io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
io_cqring_wake(ctx);
}
+ io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
}
static void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -649,8 +641,8 @@ static void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
- io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
io_cqring_wake(ctx);
+ io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
}
/* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 9b51afdae505..20140d3505f1 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -985,9 +985,9 @@ int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
- io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)
io_cqring_wake(ctx);
+ io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
}
void io_rw_fail(struct io_kiocb *req)
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-15 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-15 17:31 [RFC 00/16] caching and SQ/CQ optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 01/16] io_uring: improve cqe !tracing hot path Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 02/16] io_uring: cqe init hardening Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-19 15:03 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-24 16:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 03/16] io_uring: simplify big_cqe handling Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 04/16] io_uring: refactor __io_get_cqe() Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 05/16] io_uring: optimise extra io_get_cqe null check Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 07/16] io_uring: merge iopoll and normal completion paths Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 08/16] io_uring: compact SQ/CQ heads/tails Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-19 15:05 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-24 16:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 09/16] io_uring: add option to remove SQ indirection Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-19 15:06 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 10/16] io_uring: static_key for !IORING_SETUP_NO_SQARRAY Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 11/16] io_uring: move non aligned field to the end Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 12/16] io_uring: banish non-hot data to end of io_ring_ctx Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 13/16] io_uring: separate task_work/waiting cache line Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 14/16] io_uring: move multishot cqe cache in ctx Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 15/16] io_uring: move iopoll ctx fields around Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 16/16] io_uring: force inline io_fill_cqe_req Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c6e71a25b020c8dcf554d30ac556378e0d6e318b.1692119257.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox