* [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api
@ 2022-02-09 19:04 Stefan Roesch
2022-02-10 0:43 ` Ammar Faizi
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roesch @ 2022-02-09 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, kernel-team; +Cc: viro, shr
This adds a test for the statx api to verify that io-uring statx api is
stable.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
---
test/statx.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/statx.c b/test/statx.c
index c0f9e9c..61268d4 100644
--- a/test/statx.c
+++ b/test/statx.c
@@ -77,6 +77,61 @@ err:
return -1;
}
+static int test_statx_stable(struct io_uring *ring, const char *path)
+{
+ struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
+ struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
+ struct statx x1, x2;
+ char path1[PATH_MAX];
+ char path2[PATH_MAX];
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ strcpy(path2, path);
+ strcpy(path1, path);
+
+ sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
+ if (!sqe) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "get sqe failed\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ io_uring_prep_statx(sqe, -1, path1, 0, STATX_ALL, &x1);
+
+ ret = io_uring_submit(ring);
+ if (ret <= 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "sqe submit failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ memset(path1, 0, sizeof(path1));
+
+ ret = io_uring_wait_cqe(ring, &cqe);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "wait completion %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = cqe->res;
+ io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe);
+ if (ret) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "statx res = %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = do_statx(-1, path2, 0, STATX_ALL, &x2);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return statx_syscall_supported();
+
+ if (memcmp(&x1, &x2, sizeof(x1))) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Miscompare between io_uring and statx\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = 0;
+
+err:
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int test_statx_fd(struct io_uring *ring, const char *path)
{
struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
@@ -156,6 +211,16 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
goto err;
}
+ ret = test_statx_stable(&ring, fname);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+ fprintf(stdout, "statx not supported, skipping\n");
+ goto done;
+ }
+ fprintf(stderr, "test_statx_loop failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
ret = test_statx_fd(&ring, fname);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "test_statx_fd failed: %d\n", ret);
base-commit: d9b0a424471f5c584f1d3f370e1746925733c01a
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api
2022-02-09 19:04 [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api Stefan Roesch
@ 2022-02-10 0:43 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-02-10 0:53 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-02-10 2:06 ` Ammar Faizi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ammar Faizi @ 2022-02-10 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Roesch, io-uring, kernel-team; +Cc: viro
On 2/10/22 2:04 AM, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> This adds a test for the statx api to verify that io-uring statx api is
> stable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
> ---
> test/statx.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/test/statx.c b/test/statx.c
> index c0f9e9c..61268d4 100644
> --- a/test/statx.c
> +++ b/test/statx.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,61 @@ err:
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static int test_statx_stable(struct io_uring *ring, const char *path)
> +{
> + struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
> + struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
> + struct statx x1, x2;
> + char path1[PATH_MAX];
> + char path2[PATH_MAX];
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + strcpy(path2, path);
> + strcpy(path1, path);
> +
> + sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
> + if (!sqe) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "get sqe failed\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + io_uring_prep_statx(sqe, -1, path1, 0, STATX_ALL, &x1);
> +
> + ret = io_uring_submit(ring);
> + if (ret <= 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "sqe submit failed: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> + memset(path1, 0, sizeof(path1));
> +
> + ret = io_uring_wait_cqe(ring, &cqe);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "wait completion %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cqe->res;
> + io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe);
> + if (ret) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "statx res = %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = do_statx(-1, path2, 0, STATX_ALL, &x2);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return statx_syscall_supported();
> +
> + if (memcmp(&x1, &x2, sizeof(x1))) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Miscompare between io_uring and statx\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
If we fail on memcmp() here, the ret should be set to non-zero *explicitly*.
Otherwise, we have zero exit code since statx returns 0 on success.
I think that one can also be simplified like this:
ret = memcmp(&x1, &x2, sizeof(x1));
if (ret)
fprintf(stderr, "Miscompare between io_uring and statx\n");
return ret;
--
Ammar Faizi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api
2022-02-09 19:04 [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api Stefan Roesch
2022-02-10 0:43 ` Ammar Faizi
@ 2022-02-10 0:53 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-02-10 2:06 ` Ammar Faizi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ammar Faizi @ 2022-02-10 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Roesch, io-uring, kernel-team; +Cc: viro
On 2/10/22 2:04 AM, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> @@ -156,6 +211,16 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> goto err;
> }
>
> + ret = test_statx_stable(&ring, fname);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> + fprintf(stdout, "statx not supported, skipping\n");
> + goto done;
> + }
> + fprintf(stderr, "test_statx_loop failed: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
Why do we call it test_statx_loop? Isn't the function name test_statx_stable?
--
Ammar Faizi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api
2022-02-09 19:04 [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api Stefan Roesch
2022-02-10 0:43 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-02-10 0:53 ` Ammar Faizi
@ 2022-02-10 2:06 ` Ammar Faizi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ammar Faizi @ 2022-02-10 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Roesch, io-uring, kernel-team; +Cc: viro
On 2/10/22 2:04 AM, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> This adds a test for the statx api to verify that io-uring statx api is
> stable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
> ---
> test/statx.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/test/statx.c b/test/statx.c
> index c0f9e9c..61268d4 100644
> --- a/test/statx.c
> +++ b/test/statx.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,61 @@ err:
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static int test_statx_stable(struct io_uring *ring, const char *path)
> +{
> + struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
> + struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
> + struct statx x1, x2;
> + char path1[PATH_MAX];
> + char path2[PATH_MAX];
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + strcpy(path2, path);
> + strcpy(path1, path);
> +
> + sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
> + if (!sqe) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "get sqe failed\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + io_uring_prep_statx(sqe, -1, path1, 0, STATX_ALL, &x1);
> +
> + ret = io_uring_submit(ring);
> + if (ret <= 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "sqe submit failed: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> + memset(path1, 0, sizeof(path1));
> +
> + ret = io_uring_wait_cqe(ring, &cqe);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "wait completion %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cqe->res;
> + io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe);
> + if (ret) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "statx res = %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = do_statx(-1, path2, 0, STATX_ALL, &x2);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return statx_syscall_supported();
> +
> + if (memcmp(&x1, &x2, sizeof(x1))) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Miscompare between io_uring and statx\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
If we fail on memcmp() here, the ret should be set to non-zero *explicitly*.
Otherwise, we have zero exit code since statx returns 0 on success.
I think that one can also be simplified like this:
[...]
ret = memcmp(&x1, &x2, sizeof(x1));
if (ret)
fprintf(stderr, "Miscompare between io_uring and statx\n");
err:
return ret;
}
> +
> + ret = 0;
> +
> +err:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int test_statx_fd(struct io_uring *ring, const char *path)
> {
> struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
> @@ -156,6 +211,16 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> goto err;
> }
>
> + ret = test_statx_stable(&ring, fname);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> + fprintf(stdout, "statx not supported, skipping\n");
> + goto done;
> + }
> + fprintf(stderr, "test_statx_loop failed: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> ret = test_statx_fd(&ring, fname);
> if (ret) {
> fprintf(stderr, "test_statx_fd failed: %d\n", ret);
>
> base-commit: d9b0a424471f5c584f1d3f370e1746925733c01a
--
Ammar Faizi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-10 2:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-09 19:04 [PATCH v1] liburing: add test for stable statx api Stefan Roesch
2022-02-10 0:43 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-02-10 0:53 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-02-10 2:06 ` Ammar Faizi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox