public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/5] io_uring: always let io_iopoll_complete() complete polled io.
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:17:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 08/12/2020 21:10, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/8/20 12:24 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 08/12/2020 19:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 12/8/20 12:12 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> On 07/12/2020 16:28, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 3:26 PM Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> From: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason is that once we got a non EAGAIN error in io_wq_submit_work(),
>>>>>> we'll complete req by calling io_req_complete(), which will hold completion_lock
>>>>>> to call io_commit_cqring(), but for polled io, io_iopoll_complete() won't
>>>>>> hold completion_lock to call io_commit_cqring(), then there maybe concurrent
>>>>>> access to ctx->defer_list, double free may happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To fix this bug, we always let io_iopoll_complete() complete polled io.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch is causing hangs with iopoll testing, if you end up getting
>>>>> -EAGAIN on request submission. I've dropped it.
>>>>
>>>> I fail to understand without debugging how does it happen, especially since
>>>> it shouldn't even get out of the while in io_wq_submit_work(). Is that
>>>> something obvious I've missed?
>>>
>>> I didn't have time to look into it, and haven't yet, just reporting that
>>> it very reliably fails (and under what conditions).
>>
>> Yeah, I get it, asked just in case.
>> I'll see what's going on if Xiaoguang wouldn't handle it before.
> 
> Should be trivial to reproduce on eg nvme by doing:
> 
> echo mq-deadline > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/scheduler
> echo 2 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/nr_requests
> 
> and then run test/iopoll on that device. I'll try and take a look
> tomorrow unless someone beats me to it.

Tried out with iopoll-enabled null_blk. test/iopoll fails with
"test_io_uring_submit_enters failed", but if remove iteration limit
from the test, it completes... eventually.

premise: io_complete_rw_iopoll() gets -EAGAIN but returns 0 to
io_wq_submit_work().
The old version happily completes IO with that 0, but the patch delays
it to do_iopoll(), which retries and so all that repeats. And, I believe,
that the behaviour that io_wq_submit_work()'s -EGAIN check was trying to
achieve...

The question left is why no one progresses. May even be something in block.
Need to trace further.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-06 22:22 [PATCH 5.10 0/5] iopoll fixes Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-06 22:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/5] io_uring: always let io_iopoll_complete() complete polled io Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-07 16:28   ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08 19:12     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-08 19:17       ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08 19:24         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-08 21:10           ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-09 20:17             ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-12-10 17:38               ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-06 22:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/5] io_uring: fix racy IOPOLL completions Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-07 18:31   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-06 22:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 3/5] io_uring: fix racy IOPOLL flush overflow Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-06 22:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 4/5] io_uring: fix io_cqring_events()'s noflush Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-06 22:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 5/5] io_uring: fix mis-seting personality's creds Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-07 15:05 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/5] iopoll fixes Jens Axboe
2020-12-07 15:24   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-07 15:28     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox