From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.10] io_uring: remove req cancel in ->flush()
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:08:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21aca47e03c82a06e4ea1140b328a86d04d1f422.1603122023.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On 10/19/20 9:45 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Every close(io_uring) causes cancellation of all inflight requests
> carrying ->files. That's not nice but was neccessary up until recently.
> Now task->files removal is handled in the core code, so that part of
> flush can be removed.
It does change the behavior, but I'd wager that's safe. One minor
comment:
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 95d2bb7069c6..6536e24eb44e 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -8748,16 +8748,12 @@ void __io_uring_task_cancel(void)
>
> static int io_uring_flush(struct file *file, void *data)
> {
> - struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> + bool exiting = !data;
>
> - /*
> - * If the task is going away, cancel work it may have pending
> - */
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || (current->flags & PF_EXITING))
> - data = NULL;
> + exiting = true;
>
> - io_uring_cancel_task_requests(ctx, data);
> - io_uring_attempt_task_drop(file, !data);
> + io_uring_attempt_task_drop(file, exiting);
> return 0;
> }
Why not just keep the !data for task_drop? Would make the diff take
away just the hunk we're interested in. Even adding a comment would be
better, imho.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-19 15:45 [PATCH for-5.10] io_uring: remove req cancel in ->flush() Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-19 20:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-10-19 23:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-20 14:09 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-20 16:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-20 16:59 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-22 6:42 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-22 11:44 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-23 3:33 ` Xiaoguang Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox