public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring fixes for 6.0-rc1
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:08:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 8/12/22 3:01 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/12/22 2:44 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2022, at 2:28 PM, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> ?On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 5:46 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> - Small series improving type safety of the sqe fields (Stefan)
>>>
>>> This doesn't work AT ALL.
>>>
>>> A basic allmodconfig build fails with tons of errors. It starts with
>>>
>>>  In function ?io_kiocb_cmd_sz_check?,
>>>      inlined from ?io_prep_rw? at io_uring/rw.c:38:21:
>>>  ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:354:45: error: call to
>>> ?__compiletime_assert_802? declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
>>> failed: cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data)
>>>    354 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
>>> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>>>        |                                             ^
>>>  ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:335:25: note: in definition of
>>> macro ?__compiletime_assert?
>>>    335 |                         prefix ## suffix();
>>>           \
>>>        |                         ^~~~~~
>>>  ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:354:9: note: in expansion of
>>> macro ?_compiletime_assert?
>>>    354 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
>>> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>>>        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>  ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
>>> ?compiletime_assert?
>>>     39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
>>>        |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>  ./include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro
>>> ?BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG?
>>>     50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: "
>>> #condition)
>>>        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>  ./include/linux/io_uring_types.h:496:9: note: in expansion of macro
>>> ?BUILD_BUG_ON?
>>>    496 |         BUILD_BUG_ON(cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data));
>>>        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> and goes downhill from there.
>>>
>>> I don't think this can have seen any testing at all.
>>
>> Wtf? I always run allmodconfig before sending and it also ran testing.
>> I?ll check shortly. Sorry about that, whatever went wrong here. 
> 
> My test box is still on the same sha from this morning, which is:
> 
> commit 2ae08b36c06ea8df73a79f6b80ff7964e006e9e3 (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
> Merge: 21f9c8a13bb2 8bb5e7f4dcd9
> Author: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> Date:   Thu Aug 11 09:23:08 2022 -0700
> 
>     Merge tag 'input-for-v5.20-rc0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input
> 
> with io_uring-6.0 (ff34d8d06a1f16b6a58fb41bfbaa475cc6c02497) and
> block-6.0 (aa0c680c3aa96a5f9f160d90dd95402ad578e2b0) pulled in, and it
> builds just fine for me:
> 
> axboe@r7525 ~/gi/build (test)> make clean                                    9.827s
>   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/conf.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/confdata.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/expr.o
>   LEX     scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.c
>   YACC    scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.[ch]
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/menu.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/preprocess.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/symbol.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/util.o
>   HOSTLD  scripts/kconfig/conf
> #
> # No change to .config
> #
> axboe@r7525 ~/gi/build (test)> time make -j256 -s
> 
> ________________________________________________________
> Executed in  172.67 secs    fish           external
>    usr time  516.61 mins  396.00 micros  516.61 mins
>    sys time   44.40 mins    0.00 micros   44.40 mins
> 
> using:
> 
> axboe@r7525 ~/gi/build (test)> gcc --version
> gcc (Debian 12.1.0-7) 12.1.0
> 
> Puzzled, I'll keep poking...

I re-did an allmodconfig, and also built on arm64, and I have to say I'm
puzzled with what you are seeing. Updated to latest master as well,
nothing. Furthermore, I have the build bot send me successful build
notifications as well, not just the errors, and here's what it reported
12h ago:

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git io_uring-6.0
branch HEAD: ff34d8d06a1f16b6a58fb41bfbaa475cc6c02497  io_uring: add missing BUILD_BUG_ON() checks for new io_uring_sqe fields

elapsed time: 882m

configs tested: 53
configs skipped: 2

The following configs have been built successfully.
More configs may be tested in the coming days.

gcc tested configs:
um                           x86_64_defconfig
um                             i386_defconfig
i386                                defconfig
i386                          randconfig-a014
i386                          randconfig-a012
i386                          randconfig-a016
x86_64                        randconfig-a013
x86_64                        randconfig-a011
arc                  randconfig-r043-20220811
arm                                 defconfig
x86_64                        randconfig-a015
m68k                             allmodconfig
arc                              allyesconfig
i386                             allyesconfig
i386                          randconfig-a001
x86_64                          rhel-8.3-func
i386                          randconfig-a003
x86_64                              defconfig
alpha                            allyesconfig
mips                             allyesconfig
arm                              allyesconfig
x86_64                         rhel-8.3-kunit
m68k                             allyesconfig
powerpc                           allnoconfig
arm64                            allyesconfig
i386                          randconfig-a005
x86_64                               rhel-8.3
sh                               allmodconfig
x86_64                           rhel-8.3-kvm
x86_64                           allyesconfig
x86_64                    rhel-8.3-kselftests
x86_64                           rhel-8.3-syz
x86_64                        randconfig-a002
x86_64                        randconfig-a004
x86_64                        randconfig-a006
ia64                             allmodconfig
powerpc                          allmodconfig

clang tested configs:
i386                          randconfig-a011
i386                          randconfig-a013
hexagon              randconfig-r045-20220811
hexagon              randconfig-r041-20220811
x86_64                        randconfig-a012
s390                 randconfig-r044-20220811
i386                          randconfig-a015
riscv                randconfig-r042-20220811
x86_64                        randconfig-a014
x86_64                        randconfig-a016
i386                          randconfig-a002
i386                          randconfig-a006
i386                          randconfig-a004
x86_64                        randconfig-a001
x86_64                        randconfig-a003
x86_64                        randconfig-a005

building that very same sha I sent you. WTF? I assure you this thing has
been both built, and not just by me, and runtime tested as per usual.
Why it fails on your end, I really have no good clue right now.


-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-12 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-12 12:46 [GIT PULL] io_uring fixes for 6.0-rc1 Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 20:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-12 20:44   ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 21:01     ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 21:08       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-08-12 21:34         ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 21:43           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-12 21:53             ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 21:54             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-12 22:01               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-12 22:16                 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 22:11               ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 22:19                 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 22:23                   ` Keith Busch
2022-08-12 22:25                     ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 22:27                       ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 22:35                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-12 22:38                       ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 22:52                         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-12 22:55                           ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 21:37         ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-11  1:01 Jens Axboe
2022-08-11 14:35 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-13 21:48 ` pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox