public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] 5.9 small cleanups/fixes
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:28:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 30/07/2020 21:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/30/20 9:43 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> [1/1] takes apart the union, too much trouble and there is no reason
>> left for keeping it. Probably for 5.10 we can reshuffle the layout as
>> discussed.
> 
> Let's hope so, because I do think this is the safest option, but it does
> incur a 5% drop for me.

Hmm, any ideas why? If your test doesn't use neither apoll/poll/io-wq,
then it looks like either something related to slab (e.g. partial zeroing),
or magic with @task_work moved from 4th to 3rd cacheline.

> 
> We could probably make this work for 5.9 as well, depending on if there
> is an -rc8 or not. Seems like there will be, hence we're a week and a
> half out from the merge window.
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-31 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-30 15:43 [PATCH 0/6] 5.9 small cleanups/fixes Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: de-unionise io_kiocb Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] io_uring: deduplicate __io_complete_rw() Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] io_uring: fix racy overflow count reporting Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 17:18   ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-30 17:33     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 17:41       ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-30 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] io_uring: fix stalled deferred requests Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] io_uring: consolidate *_check_overflow accounting Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 15:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] io_uring: get rid of atomic FAA for cq_timeouts Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-30 18:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] 5.9 small cleanups/fixes Jens Axboe
2020-07-31 14:28   ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-07-31 15:10     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox