Am 06.05.20 um 16:46 schrieb Andreas Schneider via samba-technical:
> On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 16:08:03 CEST Stefan Metzmacher via samba-technical 
> wrote:
>> Am 06.05.20 um 14:41 schrieb Anoop C S:
>>> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 12:33 +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
>>>> Hi Anoop,
>>>>
>>>>> I could reproduce the difference in SHA256 checksum after copying a
>>>>> directory with 100 copies of test file(provided by reporter) from
>>>>> io_uring VFS module enabled share using Windows explorer(right-
>>>>> click-
>>>>>
>>>>>> copy/paste). Only 5 out of 100 files had correct checksum after
>>>>>> copy
>>>>>
>>>>> operation :-/
>>>>
>>>> Great! Can you please try to collect level 1 log files with
>>>> the patch https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=15955
>>>> applied?
>>>
>>> I have attached three log files.
>>> log.io_uring.smbd -- Copy using Windows explorer
>>> log.io_uring-mget.smd -- Copy using smbclient
>>> log.io_uring-powershell.smd -- Copy using `Copy-Item`
>>
>> Thanks! All of them show short reads like:
>>> [2020/05/06 17:27:28.130248,  1]
>>> ../../source3/modules/vfs_io_uring.c:103(vfs_io_uring_finish_req)> 
>>>   vfs_io_uring_finish_req: pread ofs=0 (0x0) len=32768 (0x8000)
>>>   nread=32768 (0x32768) eof=10000000 (0x989680) blks=4096 blocks=19536
>>>   dir/1.bin fnum 1607026405> 
>>> [2020/05/06 17:27:28.131049,  1]
>>> ../../source3/modules/vfs_io_uring.c:103(vfs_io_uring_finish_req)> 
>>>   vfs_io_uring_finish_req: pread ofs=9969664 (0x982000) len=30336 (0x7680)
>>>   nread=30336 (0x30336) eof=10000000 (0x989680) blks=4096 blocks=19536
>>>   dir/1.bin fnum 1607026405> 
>>> [2020/05/06 17:27:28.133679,  1]
>>> ../../source3/modules/vfs_io_uring.c:103(vfs_io_uring_finish_req)> 
>>>   vfs_io_uring_finish_req: pread ofs=61440 (0xf000) len=32768 (0x8000)
>>>   nread=32768 (0x32768) eof=10000000 (0x989680) blks=4096 blocks=19536
>>>   dir/1.bin fnum 1607026405> 
>>> [2020/05/06 17:27:28.140184,  0]
>>> ../../source3/modules/vfs_io_uring.c:88(vfs_io_uring_finish_req)> 
>>>   vfs_io_uring_finish_req: Invalid pread ofs=0 (0x0) len=1048576
>>>   (0x100000) nread=32768 (0x32768) eof=10000000 (0x989680) blks=4096
>>>   blocks=19536 dir/1.bin fnum 1607026405
>> It seems the first request is at ofs=0 len=32768 (0x8000) and we get
>> 32768 back.
>> A follow up request with ofs=0 len=1048576 (0x100000) only gets the
>> first 32768 bytes which are already in the page cache.
>>
>> I can easily reproduce this with the Ubuntu 5.4 kernel once I add
>> state->ur.sqe.rw_flags |= RWF_NOWAIT; to vfs_io_uring_pread_send()
>> and use this.
>>
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>> head -c 1024 /root/samba-test/ff1.dat | hexdump -C
>> 00000000  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>
>> |................|
>>
>> *
>> 00000400
>> smbclient //172.31.9.167/uringff -Uroot%test -c "get ff1.dat"
>>
>> results in this log entries:
>>> [2020/05/06 06:51:57.069990,  0]
>>> ../../source3/modules/vfs_io_uring.c:89(vfs_io_uring_finish_req)> 
>>>   vfs_io_uring_finish_req: Invalid pread ofs=0 (0x0) len=8388608
>>>   (0x800000) nread=16384 (0x4000) eof=8388608 (0x800000) blks=4096
>>>   blocks=16384 ff1.dat fnum 840153065> 
>>> [2020/05/06 06:51:57.076882,  1]
>>> ../../source3/modules/vfs_io_uring.c:104(vfs_io_uring_finish_req)> 
>>>   vfs_io_uring_finish_req: pread ofs=16384 (0x4000) len=8372224 (0x7fc000)
>>>   nread=8372224 (0x7fc000) eof=8388608 (0x800000) blks=4096 blocks=16384
>>>   ff1.dat fnum 840153065
>> smbclient is just smart enough to recover itself from the short read.
>> But the windows client isn't.
>>
>> The attached test against liburing (git://git.kernel.dk/liburing) should
>> be able to demonstrate the problem. It can also be found in
>> https://github.com/metze-samba/liburing/tree/implicit-rwf-nowaithttps://gith
>> ub.com/metze-samba/liburing/commit/eb06dcfde747e46bd08bedf9def2e6cb536c39e3
>>
>>
>> I added the sqe->rw_flags = RWF_NOWAIT; line in order to demonstrate it
>> against the Ubuntu 5.3 and 5.4 kernels. They both seem to have the bug.
>>
>> Can someone run the unmodified test/implicit-rwf_nowait against
>> a newer kernel?
> 
> $ uname -a
> Linux magrathea 5.6.8-1-default #1 SMP Thu Apr 30 10:47:01 UTC 2020 (63116ab) 
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> $ ./a.out 
> cqe res=4096 != 8192

Thanks for confirming, it passes fine on 5.3 and 5.4 kernels.

metze