From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v2] io_uring/net: handle -EINPROGRESS correct for IORING_OP_CONNECT
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 20:43:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
We treat EINPROGRESS like EAGAIN, but if we're retrying post getting
EINPROGRESS, then we just need to check the socket for errors and
terminate the request.
This was exposed on a bluetooth connection request which ends up
taking a while and hitting EINPROGRESS, and yields a CQE result of
-EBADFD because we're retrying a connect on a socket that is now
connected.
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 87f80d623c6c ("io_uring: handle connect -EINPROGRESS like -EAGAIN")
Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/671
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
Since v1:
- Send out the right version of the patch, there's no need to
setup async data for the EINPROGRESS retry.
diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index 6b69eff6887e..c2fbe8f083fb 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct io_connect {
struct file *file;
struct sockaddr __user *addr;
int addr_len;
+ bool in_progress;
};
struct io_sr_msg {
@@ -1382,6 +1383,7 @@ int io_connect_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
conn->addr = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
conn->addr_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr2);
+ conn->in_progress = false;
return 0;
}
@@ -1393,6 +1395,18 @@ int io_connect(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
int ret;
bool force_nonblock = issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
+ if (connect->in_progress) {
+ struct socket *socket;
+
+ socket = sock_from_file(req->file);
+ if (unlikely(!socket)) {
+ ret = -EBADF;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ret = sock_error(socket->sk);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (req_has_async_data(req)) {
io = req->async_data;
} else {
@@ -1409,13 +1423,17 @@ int io_connect(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = __sys_connect_file(req->file, &io->address,
connect->addr_len, file_flags);
if ((ret == -EAGAIN || ret == -EINPROGRESS) && force_nonblock) {
- if (req_has_async_data(req))
- return -EAGAIN;
- if (io_alloc_async_data(req)) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
+ if (ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
+ connect->in_progress = true;
+ } else {
+ if (req_has_async_data(req))
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ if (io_alloc_async_data(req)) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ memcpy(req->async_data, &__io, sizeof(__io));
}
- memcpy(req->async_data, &__io, sizeof(__io));
return -EAGAIN;
}
if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
--
Jens Axboe
reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox