public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] return nxt propagation within io-wq ctx
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:53:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)

After io_put_req_find_next() was patched, handlers no more return
next work, but enqueue them through io_queue_async_work() (mostly
by io_put_work() -> io_put_req()). The patchset fixes that.

Patches 1-2 clean up and removes all futile attempts to get nxt from
the opcode handlers. The 3rd one moves all this propagation idea into
work->put_work(). And the rest ones are small clean up on top.

Pavel Begunkov (5):
  io_uring: remove @nxt from the handlers
  io_uring/io-wq: pass *work instead of **workptr
  io_uring/io-wq: allow put_work return next work
  io_uring: remove extra nxt check after punt
  io_uring: remove io_prep_next_work()

 fs/io-wq.c    |  28 ++---
 fs/io-wq.h    |   4 +-
 fs/io_uring.c | 334 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 220 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28 22:53 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-02-28 22:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: remove @nxt from the handlers Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 22:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring/io-wq: pass *work instead of **workptr Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 22:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring/io-wq: allow put_work return next work Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 22:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: remove extra nxt check after punt Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 22:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: remove io_prep_next_work() Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox