From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH REBASE v2 0/5] return nxt propagation within io-wq ctx
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 02:37:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
After io_put_req_find_next() was patched, handlers no more return
next work, but enqueue them through io_queue_async_work() (mostly
by io_put_work() -> io_put_req()). The patchset fixes that.
Patches 1-2 clean up and removes all futile attempts to get nxt from
the opcode handlers. The 3rd one moves all this propagation idea into
work->put_work(). And the rest ones are small clean up on top.
v2: rebase on top of poll changes
Pavel Begunkov (5):
io_uring: remove @nxt from the handlers
io_uring/io-wq: pass *work instead of **workptr
io_uring/io-wq: allow put_work return next work
io_uring: remove extra nxt check after punt
io_uring: remove io_prep_next_work()
fs/io-wq.c | 28 ++---
fs/io-wq.h | 4 +-
fs/io_uring.c | 320 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
--
2.24.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-28 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 23:37 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-02-28 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] io_uring: remove @nxt from the handlers Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] io_uring/io-wq: pass *work instead of **workptr Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] io_uring/io-wq: allow put_work return next work Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] io_uring: remove extra nxt check after punt Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-28 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] io_uring: remove io_prep_next_work() Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-29 18:44 ` [PATCH REBASE v2 0/5] return nxt propagation within io-wq ctx Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-29 19:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox