From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 19:18:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
There are several independent parts in the patchset, but bundled
to make a point.
1-2: random stuff, that implicitly used later.
3-5: restore @nxt propagation
6-8: optimise locking in io_worker_handle_work()
9: optimise io_uring refcounting
The next propagation bits are done similarly as it was before, but
- nxt stealing is now at top-level, but not hidden in handlers
- ensure there is no with REQ_F_DONT_STEAL_NEXT
[6-8] is the reason to dismiss the previous @nxt propagation appoach,
I didn't found a good way to do the same. Even though it looked
clearer and without new flag.
Performance tested it with link-of-nops + IOSQE_ASYNC:
link size: 100
orig: 501 (ns per nop)
0-8: 446
0-9: 416
link size: 10
orig: 826
0-8: 776
0-9: 756
Pavel Begunkov (9):
io_uring: clean up io_close
io-wq: fix IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL cancellation
io_uring: make submission ref putting consistent
io_uring: remove @nxt from handlers
io_uring: get next req on subm ref drop
io-wq: shuffle io_worker_handle_work() code
io-wq: io_worker_handle_work() optimise locking
io-wq: optimise double lock for io_get_next_work()
io_uring: pass submission ref to async
fs/io-wq.c | 162 ++++++++++++----------
fs/io_uring.c | 366 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
2 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)
--
2.24.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-01 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-01 16:18 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] io_uring: clean up io_close Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] io-wq: fix IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL cancellation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 14:24 ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] io_uring: make submission ref putting consistent Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] io_uring: remove @nxt from handlers Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] io_uring: get next req on subm ref drop Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 21:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] io-wq: shuffle io_worker_handle_work() code Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] io-wq: io_worker_handle_work() optimise locking Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] io-wq: optimise double lock for io_get_next_work() Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] io_uring: pass submission ref to async Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 21:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 15:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-02 15:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:23 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 19:14 ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-01 20:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox