public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation
Date: Sun,  1 Mar 2020 19:18:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)

There are several independent parts in the patchset, but bundled
to make a point.
1-2: random stuff, that implicitly used later.
3-5: restore @nxt propagation
6-8: optimise locking in io_worker_handle_work()
9: optimise io_uring refcounting

The next propagation bits are done similarly as it was before, but
- nxt stealing is now at top-level, but not hidden in handlers
- ensure there is no with REQ_F_DONT_STEAL_NEXT

[6-8] is the reason to dismiss the previous @nxt propagation appoach,
I didn't found a good way to do the same. Even though it looked
clearer and without new flag.

Performance tested it with link-of-nops + IOSQE_ASYNC:

link size: 100
orig:  501 (ns per nop)
0-8:   446
0-9:   416

link size: 10
orig:  826
0-8:   776
0-9:   756

Pavel Begunkov (9):
  io_uring: clean up io_close
  io-wq: fix IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL cancellation
  io_uring: make submission ref putting consistent
  io_uring: remove @nxt from handlers
  io_uring: get next req on subm ref drop
  io-wq: shuffle io_worker_handle_work() code
  io-wq: io_worker_handle_work() optimise locking
  io-wq: optimise double lock for io_get_next_work()
  io_uring: pass submission ref to async

 fs/io-wq.c    | 162 ++++++++++++----------
 fs/io_uring.c | 366 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 2 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-01 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-01 16:18 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] io_uring: clean up io_close Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] io-wq: fix IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL cancellation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 14:24   ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] io_uring: make submission ref putting consistent Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] io_uring: remove @nxt from handlers Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] io_uring: get next req on subm ref drop Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 21:31   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] io-wq: shuffle io_worker_handle_work() code Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] io-wq: io_worker_handle_work() optimise locking Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] io-wq: optimise double lock for io_get_next_work() Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] io_uring: pass submission ref to async Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 21:39   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 15:08     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 15:12       ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-02 15:26         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:23 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:41   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 19:14 ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-01 20:33   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 14:39     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox