From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [RFC 0/2] 3 cacheline io_kiocb
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 11:31:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
That's not final for a several reasons, but good enough for discussion.
That brings io_kiocb down to 192B. I didn't try to benchmark it
properly, but quick nop test gave +5% throughput increase.
7531 vs 7910 KIOPS with fio/t/io_uring
The whole situation is obviously a bunch of tradeoffs. For instance,
instead of shrinking it, we can inline apoll to speed apoll path.
[2/2] just for a reference, I'm thinking about other ways to shrink it.
e.g. ->link_list can be a single-linked list with linked tiemouts
storing a back-reference. This can turn out to be better, because
that would move ->fixed_file_refs to the 2nd cacheline, so we won't
ever touch 3rd cacheline in the submission path.
Any other ideas?
note: on top of for-5.9/io_uring,
f56040b819998 ("io_uring: deduplicate io_grab_files() calls")
Pavel Begunkov (2):
io_uring: allocate req->work dynamically
io_uring: unionise ->apoll and ->work
fs/io-wq.h | 1 +
fs/io_uring.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
--
2.24.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-25 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-25 8:31 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-07-25 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: allocate req->work dynamically Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-25 8:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: unionise ->apoll and ->work Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-25 15:45 ` [RFC 0/2] 3 cacheline io_kiocb Jens Axboe
2020-07-25 18:24 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-25 19:40 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-25 20:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-25 20:25 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox