public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] Complete setup before calling wake_up_new_task() and improve task->comm
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 01:00:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Hi,

now that we have an explicit wake_up_new_task() in order to start the
result from create_io_thread(), we should things up before calling
wake_up_new_task().

There're also some improvements around task->comm:
- We return 0 bytes for /proc/<pid>/cmdline

While doing this I noticed a few places we check for
PF_KTHREAD, but not PF_IO_WORKER, maybe we should
have something like a PS_IS_KERNEL_THREAD_MASK() macro
that should be used in generic places and only
explicitly use PF_IO_WORKER or PF_KTHREAD checks where the
difference matters.

There are also quite a number of cases where we use
same_thread_group(), I guess these need to be checked.
Should that return true if userspace threads and their iothreds
are compared?

I did some basic testing and found the problems I explained here:
https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/T/#t
They appear with and without my changes.

Changes in v2:

- I dropped/deferred these changes:
  - We no longer allow a userspace process to change
    /proc/<pid>/[task/<tid>]/comm
  - We dynamically generate comm names (up to 63 chars)
    via io_wq_worker_comm(), similar to wq_worker_comm()

Stefan Metzmacher (5):
  kernel: always initialize task->pf_io_worker to NULL
  io_uring: io_sq_thread() no longer needs to reset
    current->pf_io_worker
  io-wq: call set_task_comm() before wake_up_new_task()
  io_uring: complete sq_thread setup before calling wake_up_new_task()
  fs/proc: hide PF_IO_WORKER in get_task_cmdline()

 fs/io-wq.c     | 17 +++++++++--------
 fs/io_uring.c  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 fs/proc/base.c |  3 +++
 kernel/fork.c  |  1 +
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-20  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19 23:27 Problems with io_threads Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] Complete setup before calling wake_up_new_task() and improve task->comm Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] kernel: always initialize task->pf_io_worker to NULL Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] io_uring: io_sq_thread() no longer needs to reset current->pf_io_worker Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] io-wq: call set_task_comm() before wake_up_new_task() Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] io_uring: complete sq_thread setup before calling wake_up_new_task() Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] io-wq: protect against future set_task_comm() overflows Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] io_uring: " Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] fs/proc: hide PF_IO_WORKER in get_task_cmdline() Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] fs/proc: protect /proc/<pid>/[task/<tid>]/comm for PF_IO_WORKER Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] io-wq: add io_wq_worker_comm() helper function for dynamic proc_task_comm() generation Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-15 17:01   ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] fs/proc: make use of io_wq_worker_comm() for PF_IO_WORKER threads Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-17 22:42   ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] Complete setup before calling wake_up_new_task() and improve task->comm Jens Axboe
2021-03-17 23:06     ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-17 23:26       ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-20  0:00   ` Stefan Metzmacher [this message]
2021-03-20  0:00     ` [PATCH v2 1/5] kernel: always initialize task->pf_io_worker to NULL Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-20  0:00     ` [PATCH v2 2/5] io_uring: io_sq_thread() no longer needs to reset current->pf_io_worker Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-20  0:00     ` [PATCH v2 3/5] io-wq: call set_task_comm() before wake_up_new_task() Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-20  0:00     ` [PATCH v2 4/5] io_uring: complete sq_thread setup before calling wake_up_new_task() Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-20  0:00     ` [PATCH v2 5/5] fs/proc: hide PF_IO_WORKER in get_task_cmdline() Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-20  1:24     ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Complete setup before calling wake_up_new_task() and improve task->comm Jens Axboe
2021-03-20 19:22       ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-20 22:39         ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-19 23:46 ` Problems with io_threads Jens Axboe
2021-03-20  0:25   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-20  1:20     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox